The Hatch-Waxman (Im)Balancing Act

DSpace/Manakin Repository

The Hatch-Waxman (Im)Balancing Act

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisor Hutt, Peter Barton en_US
dc.contributor.author Karbalai, Hasneen
dc.date.accessioned 2012-12-07T15:29:19Z
dc.date.issued 2003
dc.identifier.citation The Hatch-Waxman (Im)Balancing Act (2003 Third Year Paper) en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:10015297
dc.description.abstract The Hatch-Waxman Act was intended to establish a balance between the competing interests of brand name and generic drug companies, fostering innovation while giving the public access to a wider selection of affordable drugs. However, abuses of certain provisions of the Act threaten this balance, and broad judicial interpretations ascribed to other provisions of the Act may have the unintended consequence of injuring the fledgling research tools industry. In Chapter I, this paper will navigate through the maze of the Hatch-Waxman Act’s statutory amendments, describing the Abbreviated New Drug Application (ANDA) and the Patent Term Extension procedures created by the Act, the functions that Congress probably intended these features of the Act to serve, and how successful the Act has been at meeting these goals. In Chapter II, this paper will focus on those provisions of the Act that have had the unintended consequence of prolonging brand name drug companies’ market exclusivity, and incentivizing collusion between brand name and generic drug companies, to the detriment of the public. Special emphasis will be placed on Congress' attempts at legislative reforms that involve either closing these loopholes or increasing the Federal Trade Commission's (FTC) and Justice Department's enforcement power, in response to recent criticisms by the FTC. In Chapter III, this paper will follow the gradual expansion in scope of the Bolar amendment, one of the provisions of the Act, through progressive iterations in judicial precedent, as it evolved from its originally intended role, as a balancing factor between the interests of brand name and generic drug companies, to its current role, as a potential threat to the legitimacy of the research tools industry. Other threats that certain patent law doctrines pose to this fledgling industry will also be discussed, and possible solutions will also be suggested. en_US
dc.language.iso en_US en
dash.license LAA
dc.subject Administrative law en_US
dc.subject hatch-waxman act en_US
dc.subject generic drug en_US
dc.subject brand name drug en_US
dc.subject pharmaceutical en_US
dc.subject medical device en_US
dc.subject bolar amendment en_US
dc.subject biotechnology en_US
dc.subject research tools en_US
dc.subject generic drugs en_US
dc.subject Prescription Drug Licensure en_US
dc.subject Human Drugs en_US
dc.title The Hatch-Waxman (Im)Balancing Act en_US
dc.type Paper (for course/seminar/workshop) en_US
dc.date.available 2012-12-07T15:29:19Z

Files in this item

Files Size Format View
Paper1.pdf 244.5Kb PDF View/Open
Paper1.rtf 150.8Kb RTF file View/Open
Paper1.html 152.1Kb HTML View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

 
 

Search DASH


Advanced Search
 
 

Submitters