"A Proper Objective": Constitutional Commitment and Educational Opportunity after Bolling v. Sharpe and Parents Involved in Community Schools
View/ Open
Proper Objective How LJ.pdf (145.7Kb)
Access Status
Full text of the requested work is not available in DASH at this time ("restricted access"). For more information on restricted deposits, see our FAQ.Author
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Martha L. Minow, "A Proper Objective": Constitutional Commitment and Educational Opportunity after Bolling v. Sharpe and Parents Involved in Community Schools, 55 Howard Law Journal 575 (2012).Abstract
“Segregation in public education is not reasonably related to any proper governmental objective, and thus it imposes on Negro children of the District of Columbia a burden that constitutes an arbitrary deprivation of their liberty in violation of the Due Process Clause.” (Bolling v. Sharpe, 347 U.S. 497, 500 (1954).) Four years ago, the United States Supreme Court, in a case called Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District No.1 rejected as unconstitutional two school district plans that used race in student assignments in pursuit of racially integrated public schools. (See Parents Involved in Cmty. Schs. v. Seattle Sch. Dist. No. 1, 551 U.S. 701 (2007) (plurality opinion).) Ever since, school districts and communities seeking to promote diversity within public schools have been treading treacherous water. The Court rejected two plans but did not clearly bar race-conscious means in all circumstances. Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote the controlling opinion, as he supplied the fifth vote crucial to striking down the plans in Seattle and Louisville, but he also joined the otherwise dissenting Justices in concluding that achieving the educational benefits of diversity remains a compelling interest that school districts may pursue. The Department of Justice is working hard on a guide tohelp school systems sort through the issue. I will use this subject matter to comment on how we arrived at this moment, to suggest steps addressing the issue going forward, and to reflect on the nature of our Constitution.
Citable link to this page
http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:10510847
Collections
- HLS Scholarly Articles [1913]
Contact administrator regarding this item (to report mistakes or request changes)