The adolescent transition under energetic stress: Body composition tradeoffs among adolescent women in The Gambia
View/ Open
Author
Moore, Sophie E.
Prentice, Andrew M.
Prentice, Ann
Sawo, Yankuba
Note: Order does not necessarily reflect citation order of authors.
Published Version
https://doi.org/10.1093/emph/eot005Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Reiches, Meredith W., Sophie E. Moore, Andrew M. Prentice, Ann Prentice, Yankuba Sawo, and Peter T. Ellison. 2013. “The adolescent transition under energetic stress: Body composition tradeoffs among adolescent women in The Gambia.” Evolution, Medicine, and Public Health 2013 (1): 75-85. doi:10.1093/emph/eot005. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/emph/eot005.Abstract
Background and objectives: Life history theory predicts a shift in energy allocation from growth to reproductive function as a consequence of puberty. During adolescence, linear growth tapers off and, in females, ovarian steroid production increases. In this model, acquisition of lean mass is associated with growth while investment in adiposity is associated with reproduction. This study examines the chronological and developmental predictors of energy allocation patterns among adolescent women under conditions of energy constraint. Methodology: Fifty post-menarcheal adolescent women between 14 and 20 years old were sampled for weight and body composition at the beginning and end of 1 month in an energy-adequate season and 1 month in the subsequent energy-constrained season in a rural province of The Gambia. Results: Chronologically and developmentally younger adolescent girls gain weight in the form of lean mass in both energy-adequate and energy-constrained seasons, whereas older adolescents lose lean mass under conditions of energetic stress (generalized estimating equation (GEE) Wald chi-square comparing youngest tertile with older two tertiles 9.750, P = 0.002; GEE Wald chi-square comparing fast- with slow-growing individuals for growth rate 19.806, P < 0.001). When energy is limited, younger adolescents lose and older adolescents maintain fat (GEE Wald chi-square for interaction of age and season 6.568, P = 0.010; GEE Wald chi-square comparing fast- with slow-growing individuals for interaction of growth rate and season 7.807, P = 0.005). Conclusions and implications: When energy is constrained, the physiology of younger adolescents invests in growth while that of older adolescent females privileges reproductively valuable adipose tissue.Other Sources
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3868354/pdf/Terms of Use
This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of-use#LAACitable link to this page
http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:11879556
Collections
- FAS Scholarly Articles [18292]
Contact administrator regarding this item (to report mistakes or request changes)