A Data-Driven Design Evaluation Tool for Handheld Device Soft Keyboards
View/ Open
Published Version
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0107070Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Trudeau, Matthieu B., Elsie M. Sunderland, Devin L. Jindrich, and Jack T. Dennerlein. 2014. “A Data-Driven Design Evaluation Tool for Handheld Device Soft Keyboards.” PLoS ONE 9 (9): e107070. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0107070. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0107070.Abstract
Thumb interaction is a primary technique used to operate small handheld devices such as smartphones. Despite the different techniques involved in operating a handheld device compared to a personal computer, the keyboard layouts for both devices are similar. A handheld device keyboard that considers the physical capabilities of the thumb may improve user experience. We developed and applied a design evaluation tool for different geometries of the QWERTY keyboard using a performance evaluation model. The model utilizes previously collected data on thumb motor performance and posture for different tap locations and thumb movement directions. We calculated a performance index (PITOT, 0 is worst and 2 is best) for 663 designs consisting in different combinations of three variables: the keyboard's radius of curvature (R) (mm), orientation (O) (°), and vertical location on the screen (L). The current standard keyboard performed poorly (PITOT = 0.28) compared to other designs considered. Keyboard location (L) contributed to the greatest variability in performance out of the three design variables, suggesting that designers should modify this variable first. Performance was greatest for designs in the middle keyboard location. In addition, having a slightly upward curve (R = −20 mm) and orientated perpendicular to the thumb's long axis (O = −20°) improved performance to PITOT = 1.97. Poorest performances were associated with placement of the keyboard's spacebar in the bottom right corner of the screen (e.g., the worst was for R = 20 mm, O = 40°, L = Bottom (PITOT = 0.09)). While this evaluation tool can be used in the design process as an ergonomic reference to promote user motor performance, other design variables such as visual access and usability still remain unexplored.Other Sources
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4161376/pdf/Terms of Use
This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of-use#LAACitable link to this page
http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:12987236
Collections
- FAS Scholarly Articles [18292]
- SPH Scholarly Articles [6362]
Contact administrator regarding this item (to report mistakes or request changes)