Socioeconomic rights in constitutional law: Explaining America away

DSpace/Manakin Repository

Socioeconomic rights in constitutional law: Explaining America away

Citable link to this page

. . . . . .

Title: Socioeconomic rights in constitutional law: Explaining America away
Author: Michelman, Frank
Citation: Frank I. Michelman, Socioeconomic Rights in Constitutional Law: Explaining America Away, 6 Int'l J. Constit. L. 663 (2008).
Full Text & Related Files:
Abstract: The apparent absence of a commitment to socioeconomic rights in United States constitutional law gives rise to continuing debate. It is unclear that this omission has any bearing on the actual performance of American governments in the social welfare field. Might there be other reasons for treating the omission as problematic? If so, might the omission nevertheless be explained in terms consistent with the belief that some kind of socioeconomic commitment ideally does belong in the constitutional law of a country like the U.S.? After briefly reviewing the uneasy instrumental case for a constitutionalized socioeconomic commitment, this article suggests why inclusion could be demanded, nonetheless, as a matter of political-moral principle. It then canvasses possible responses to the American case. These include both a possible denial that socioeconomic guarantees are, in fact, lacking from U.S. constitutional law and a possible claim that omitting them is the correct choice for the U.S. as a matter of nonideal political morality.
Published Version: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/icon/mon013
Terms of Use: This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of-use#LAA
Citable link to this page: http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:2640600

Show full Dublin Core record

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

 
 

Search DASH


Advanced Search
 
 

Submitters