Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCampbell, John
dc.date.accessioned2009-07-22T14:14:40Z
dc.date.issued2001
dc.identifier.citationCampbell, John Y. 2001. Why long horizons? A study of power against persistent alternatives. Journal of Empirical Finance 8, no. 5: 459-491.en
dc.identifier.issn0927-5398en
dc.identifier.urihttp://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:3196341
dc.description.abstractThis paper studies tests of predictability in regressions with a given AR(1) regressor and an asset return dependent variable measured over a short or long horizon. The paper shows that when there is a persistent predictable component in the return, an increase in the horizon may increase the R2 statistic of the regression and the approximate slope of a predictability test. Monte Carlo experiments show that long-horizon regression tests have serious size distortions when asymptotic critical values are used, but some versions of such tests have power advantages remaining after size is corrected.en
dc.description.sponsorshipEconomicsen
dc.language.isoen_USen
dc.publisherElsevieren
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0927-5398(01)00037-8en
dash.licenseLAA
dc.subjectlong-horizon regressionsen
dc.subjectpoweren
dc.subjectapproximate slopeen
dc.titleWhy Long Horizons? A Study of Power Against Persistent Alternativesen
dc.relation.journalJournal of Empirical Financeen
dash.depositing.authorCampbell, John
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/S0927-5398(01)00037-8*
dash.contributor.affiliatedCampbell, John


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record