A New Solution to the Recovered Memory Debate

DSpace/Manakin Repository

A New Solution to the Recovered Memory Debate

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author McNally, Richard
dc.contributor.author Geraerts, Elke
dc.date.accessioned 2009-08-04T17:26:33Z
dc.date.issued 2009
dc.identifier.citation McNally, Richard J., and Elke Geraerts. 2009. A new solution to the recovered memory debate. Perspectives on Psychological Science 4(2): 126-134. en
dc.identifier.issn 1745-6916 en
dc.identifier.uri http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:3203245
dc.description.abstract The controversy regarding recovered memories of childhood sexual abuse (CSA) has been characterized by two perspectives. According to one perspective, some people repress their memories of abuse because these experiences have been so emotionally traumatic, and they become capable of recalling the CSA only when it is psychologically safe to do so many years later. According to the other perspective, many reports of recovered memories of sexual abuse are false memories, often inadvertently fostered by therapists. In this article, we provide evidence for a third interpretation that applies to a subset of people reporting recollections of CSA; it does not require the concepts of repression, trauma, or false memory. These people did not experience their CSA as traumatic; they either failed to think about their abuse for years or forgot their previous recollections, and they recalled their CSA spontaneously after encountering reminders outside of psychotherapy. Their recovered memories are corroborated at the same rate as those of people who never forgot their abuse. Hence, recalling CSA after many years is not the same thing as having recalled a previously repressed memory of trauma. en
dc.description.sponsorship Psychology en
dc.language.iso en_US en
dc.publisher Blackwell Publishing en
dc.relation.isversionof http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01112.x en
dash.license META_ONLY
dc.title A New Solution to the Recovered Memory Debate en
dc.type Journal Article
dc.description.version Version of Record
dc.relation.journal Perspectives on Psychological Science en
dash.depositing.author McNally, Richard
dash.embargo.until 10000-01-01

Files in this item

Files Size Format View xmlui.dri2xhtml.METS-1.0.item-files-description
McNally_NewSolutionRecovered.pdf 125.5Kb PDF View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • FAS Scholarly Articles [7470]
    Peer reviewed scholarly articles from the Faculty of Arts and Sciences of Harvard University

Show simple item record

 
 

Search DASH


Advanced Search
 
 

Submitters