Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPyle, Elizabeth Hammond
dc.contributor.authorSantoni, Gregory Winn
dc.contributor.authorNascimento, Henrique E. M.
dc.contributor.authorHutyra, Lucy R.
dc.contributor.authorVieira, Simone
dc.contributor.authorCurran, Daniel J.
dc.contributor.authorvan Haren, Joost
dc.contributor.authorSaleska, Scott R.
dc.contributor.authorChow, Victoria Ye
dc.contributor.authorCarmago, Plinio B.
dc.contributor.authorLaurance, William
dc.contributor.authorWofsy, Steven C.
dc.date.accessioned2009-09-28T15:20:16Z
dc.date.issued2008
dc.identifier.citationPyle, Elizabeth Hammond, Gregory W. Santoni, Henrique E. M. Nascimento, Lucy R. Hutyra, Simone Vieira, Daniel J. Curran, Joost van Haren, Scott R. Saleska, V. Y. Chow, Plinio B. Carmago, William F. Laurance, and Steven C. Wofsy. 2008. Dynamics of carbon, biomass, and structure in two Amazonian forests. Journal of Geophysical Research 113, no. G00B08: 1-20en_US
dc.identifier.issn0148-0227en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:3322245
dc.description.abstractAmazon forests are potentially globally significant sources or sinks for atmospheric carbon dioxide. In this study, we characterize the spatial trends in carbon storage and fluxes in both live and dead biomass (necromass) in two Amazonian forests, the Biological Dynamic of Forest Fragments Project (BDFFP), near Manaus, Amazonas, and the Tapajós National Forest (TNF) near Santarém, Pará. We assessed coarse woody debris (CWD) stocks, tree growth, mortality, and recruitment in ground-based plots distributed across the terra firme forest at both sites. Carbon dynamics were similar within each site, but differed significantly between the sites. The BDFFP and the TNF held comparable live biomass (167 ± 7.6 MgC·ha−1 versus 149 ± 6.0 MgC·ha−1, respectively), but stocks of CWD were 2.5 times larger at TNF (16.2 ± 1.5 MgC·ha−1 at BDFFP, versus 40.1 ± 3.9 MgC·ha−1 at TNF). A model of current forest dynamics suggests that the BDFFP was close to carbon balance, and its size class structure approximated a steady state. The TNF, by contrast, showed rapid carbon accrual to live biomass (3.24 ± 0.22 MgC·ha−1·a−1 in TNF, 2.59 ± 0.16 MgC·ha−1·a−1 in BDFFP), which was more than offset by losses from large stocks of CWD, as well as ongoing shifts of biomass among size classes. This pattern in the TNF suggests recovery from a significant disturbance. The net loss of carbon from the TNF will likely last 10–15 years after the initial disturbance (controlled by the rate of decay of coarse woody debris), followed by uptake of carbon as the forest size class structure and composition continue to shift. The frequency and longevity of forests showing such disequilibruim dynamics within the larger matrix of the Amazon remains an essential question to understanding Amazonian carbon balance.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipEarth and Planetary Sciencesen_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherAmerican Geophysical Unionen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2007JG000592en_US
dash.licenseMETA_ONLY
dc.titleDynamics of Carbon, Biomass, and Structure in Two Amazonian Forestsen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.description.versionVersion of Recorden_US
dc.relation.journalJournal of Geophysical Researchen_US
dash.depositing.authorWofsy, Steven C.
dash.embargo.until10000-01-01
dc.identifier.doi10.1029/2007JG000592*
dash.contributor.affiliatedPyle, Elizabeth Hammond
dash.contributor.affiliatedLaurance, William
dash.contributor.affiliatedWofsy, Steven
dash.contributor.affiliatedChow, Victoria Ye
dash.contributor.affiliatedSantoni, Gregory


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record