Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorEpstein, David
dc.contributor.authorBates, Robert
dc.contributor.authorGoldstone, Jack
dc.contributor.authorKristensen, Ida
dc.contributor.authorO'Halloran, Sharyn
dc.date.accessioned2009-09-28T15:27:22Z
dc.date.issued2006
dc.identifier.citationEpstein, David L., Robert Bates, Jack Goldstone, Ida Kristensen, and Sharyn O'Halloran. 2006. Democratic transitions. American Journal of Political Science 50(3): 551-569.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0026-3397en_US
dc.identifier.issn0092-5853en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:3322248
dc.description.abstractPrzeworski et al. (2000) challenge the key hypothesis in modernization theory: political regimes do not transition to democracy as per capita incomes rise, they argue. Rather, democratic transitions occur randomly, but once there, countries with higher levels of GDP per capita remain democratic. We retest the modernization hypothesis using new data, new techniques, and a three-way rather than dichotomous classification of regimes. Contrary to Przeworski et al. (2000) we find that the modernization hypothesis stands up well. We also find that partial democracies emerge as among the most important and least understood regime types.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipAfrican and African American Studiesen_US
dc.description.sponsorshipGovernmenten_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishingen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00201.xen_US
dc.relation.hasversionhttp://club.fom.ru/books/democr_tr.pdfen_US
dash.licenseLAA
dc.titleDemocratic Transitionsen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.description.versionAuthor's Originalen_US
dc.relation.journalAmerican Journal of Political Scienceen_US
dash.depositing.authorBates, Robert
dc.date.available2009-09-28T15:27:22Z
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00201.x*
dash.contributor.affiliatedBates, Robert


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record