Injury in Fact, Then and Now (and Never Again): Summers v. Earth Island Institute and the Need for Change in Environmental Standing Law

DSpace/Manakin Repository

Injury in Fact, Then and Now (and Never Again): Summers v. Earth Island Institute and the Need for Change in Environmental Standing Law

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Barnum, Cassandra Jane
dc.date.accessioned 2009-11-20T17:06:11Z
dc.date.issued 2009-11-20
dc.identifier.citation 16 Mo. Env. L. & Pol. Rev __ en_US
dc.identifier.issn 1072-7396 en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:3415321
dc.description.abstract This article has 3 goals: to describe the origins and development of environmental standing law, to present theoretical objections to the requirement that environmental plaintiffs demonstrate an “injury in fact” as it is currently understood, and to use the Court’s recent decision in Summers v. Earth Island Institute to ground those theoretical objections in an actual case, and demonstrate the inadequacies of modern environmental standing doctrine. The article concludes that modern standing doctrine has no rational basis in constitutional analysis or even reasoned jurisprudence, but rather stems from a series of decisions exhibiting confused and obscure reasoning. Further, from a normative perspective, there is no reason to believe that the Constitution, either structurally via the doctrine of separation of powers or directly via Article III, requires plaintiffs to demonstrate “injury in fact.” Finally, the Court’s decision in Summers upholding the injury in fact requirement demonstrates several important truths: the Court’s efforts to liberalize standing doctrine in several recent cases were insufficiently aggressive to accomplish a permanent shift, and the injury in fact doctrine has real negative implications both for the intellectual integrity of environmental standing law and for the environment itself. en_US
dash.license LAA
dc.subject Irving Oberman Memorial Prize: Environmental Law en_US
dc.title Injury in Fact, Then and Now (and Never Again): Summers v. Earth Island Institute and the Need for Change in Environmental Standing Law en_US
dc.type Paper (for course/seminar/workshop) en_US
dc.relation.journal Missouri Environmental Law and Policy Review en_US
dash.depositing.author Barnum, Cassandra Jane
dc.date.available 2009-11-20T17:06:11Z

Files in this item

Files Size Format View
Barnum_StandingLaw.pdf 207.6Kb PDF View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

 
 

Search DASH


Advanced Search
 
 

Submitters