Brain Potentials Reflect Behavioral Differences in True and False Recognition

DSpace/Manakin Repository

Brain Potentials Reflect Behavioral Differences in True and False Recognition

Citable link to this page


Title: Brain Potentials Reflect Behavioral Differences in True and False Recognition
Author: Curran, Tim; Schacter, Daniel L.; Johnson, Marcia K.; Spinks, Ruth

Note: Order does not necessarily reflect citation order of authors.

Citation: Curran, Tim, Daniel L. Schacter, Marcia K. Johnson, and Ruth Spinks. 2001. Brain potentials reflect behavioral differences in true and false recognition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 13(2): 201-216.
Full Text & Related Files:
Abstract: People often falsely recognize nonstudied lures that are semantically similar to previously studied words. Behavioral research suggests that such false recognition is based on high semantic overlap between studied items and lures that yield a feeling of familiarity, whereas true recognition is more often associated with the recollection of details. Despite this behavioral evidence for differences between true and false recognition, research measuring brain activity (PET, fMRI, ERP) has not clearly differentiated corresponding differences in brain activity. A median split was used to separate subjects into Good and Poor performers based on their discrimination of studied targets from similar lures. Only Good performers showed late (1000-1500 msec), right frontal event-related brain potentials (ERPs) that were more positive for targets and lures compared with new items. The right frontal differences are interpreted as reflecting postretrieval evaluation processes that were more likely to be engaged by Good than Poor performers. Both Good and Poor performers showed a parietal ERP old/new effect (400-800 msec), but only Poor performers showed a parietal old/lure difference. These results are consistent with the view that the parietal and frontal ERP old/new effects reflect dissociable processes related to recollection.
Published Version: doi:10.1162/089892901564261
Terms of Use: This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at
Citable link to this page:

Show full Dublin Core record

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • FAS Scholarly Articles [8255]
    Peer reviewed scholarly articles from the Faculty of Arts and Sciences of Harvard University

Search DASH

Advanced Search