Torture at Times: Waterboarding in the Media

DSpace/Manakin Repository

Torture at Times: Waterboarding in the Media

Citable link to this page

. . . . . .

Title: Torture at Times: Waterboarding in the Media
Author: Desai, Neal (J.D. Student, Harvard Law School); Pineda, Andre; Runquist, Majken; Fusunyan, Mark Andrew; Glenn, Katy; Gould, Gabrielle Kathryn; Katz, Michelle Rachel; Lichtblau, Henry; Morgan, Maggie Jean; Wen, Sophia; Wong, Sandy

Note: Order does not necessarily reflect citation order of authors.

Citation: Neal Desai, Andre Pineda, Majken Runquist, and Mark Fusunyan, Torture at Times: Waterboarding in the Media, Joan Shorenstein Center on the Press, Politics, and Public Policy, Harvard Student Paper, April 2010
Full Text & Related Files:
Abstract: The current debate over waterboarding has spawned hundreds of newspaper articles in the last two years alone. However, waterboarding has been the subject of press attention for over a century. Examining the four newspapers with the highest daily circulation in the country, we found a significant and sudden shift in how newspapers characterized waterboarding. From the early 1930s until the modern story broke in 2004, the newspapers that covered waterboarding almost uniformly called the practice torture or implied it was torture: The New York Times characterized it thus in 81.5% (44 of 54) of articles on the subject and The Los Angeles Times did so in 96.3% of articles (26 of 27). By contrast, from 2002-2008, the studied newspapers almost never referred to waterboarding as torture. The New York Times called waterboarding torture or implied it was torture in just 2 of 143 articles (1.4%). The Los Angeles Times did so in 4.8% of articles (3 of 63). The Wall Street journal characterized the practice as torture in just 1 of 63 articles (1.6%). USA Today never called waterboarding torture or implied it was torture. In addition, the newspapers are much more likely to call waterboarding torture if a country other than the United States is the perpetrator. In The New York Times, 85.8% of articles (28 of 33) that dealt with a country other than the United States using waterboarding called it torture or implied it was torture while only 7.69% (16 of 208) did so when the United States was responsible. The Los Angeles Times characterized the practice as torture in 91.3% of articles (21 of 23) when another country was the violator, but in only 11.4% of articles (9 of 79) when the United States was the perpetrator.
Published Version: http://www.hks.harvard.edu/presspol/publications/papers/torture_at_times_hks_students.pdf
Terms of Use: This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of-use#LAA
Citable link to this page: http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:4420886

Show full Dublin Core record

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

 
 

Search DASH


Advanced Search
 
 

Submitters