Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authordeFur, Peter L.
dc.contributor.authorEvans, Gary W.
dc.contributor.authorHubal, Elaine A. Cohen
dc.contributor.authorKyle, Amy D.
dc.contributor.authorMorello-Frosch, Rachel A.
dc.contributor.authorWilliams, David
dc.date.accessioned2010-10-06T15:17:47Z
dc.date.issued2007
dc.identifier.citationdeFur, Peter L., Gary W. Evans, Elaine A. Cohen Hubal, Amy D. Kyle, Rachel A. Morello-Frosch, and David R. Williams. 2007. Vulnerability as a Function of Individual and Group Resources in Cumulative Risk Assessment. Environmental Health Perspectives 115(5): 817-824.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0091-6765en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:4459478
dc.description.abstractBackground: The field of risk assessment has focused on protecting the health of individual people or populations of wildlife from single risks, mostly from chemical exposure. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency recently began to address multiple risks to communities in the “Framework for Cumulative Risk Assessment” [EPA/630/P02/001F. Washington DC:Risk Assessment Forum, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2003)]. Simultaneously, several reports concluded that some individuals and groups are more vulnerable to environmental risks than the general population. However, vulnerability has received little specific attention in the risk assessment literature. Objective: Our objective is to examine the issue of vulnerability in cumulative risk assessment and present a conceptual framework rather than a comprehensive review of the literature. In this article we consider similarities between ecologic and human communities and the factors that make communities vulnerable to environmental risks. Discussion: The literature provides substantial evidence on single environmental factors and simple conditions that increase vulnerability or reduce resilience for humans and ecologic systems. This observation is especially true for individual people and populations of wildlife. Little research directly addresses the topic of vulnerability in cumulative risk situations, especially at the community level. The community level of organization has not been adequately considered as an end point in either human or ecologic risk assessment. Furthermore, current information on human risk does not completely explain the level of response in cumulative risk conditions. Ecologic risk situations are similarly more complex and unpredictable for cases of cumulative risk. Conclusions: Psychosocial conditions and responses are the principal missing element for humans. We propose a model for including psychologic and social factors as an integral component of cumulative risk assessment.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipAfrican and African American Studiesen_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherNational Institute of Environmental Health Sciencesen_US
dc.relation.isversionofdoi:10.1289/ehp.9332en_US
dc.relation.hasversionhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1867984/pdf/en_US
dash.licenseLAA
dc.subjectcommunitiesen_US
dc.subjectcumulative risken_US
dc.subjectenvironmental justiceen_US
dc.subjectpublic healthen_US
dc.subjectvulnerabilityen_US
dc.titleVulnerability as a Function of Individual and Group Resources in Cumulative Risk Assessmenten_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.description.versionVersion of Recorden_US
dc.relation.journalEnvironmental Health Perspectivesen_US
dash.depositing.authorWilliams, David
dc.date.available2010-10-06T15:17:47Z
dc.identifier.doi10.1289/ehp.9332*
dash.contributor.affiliatedWilliams, David


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record