| Title: | Concurrent Validity of the Child Behavior Checklist DSM-Oriented Scales: Correspondence with DSM Diagnoses and Comparison to Syndrome Scales |
| Author: |
Ebesutani, Chad; Nakamura, Brad J.; Chorpita, Bruce F.; Higa-McMillan, Charmaine K.; Bernstein, Adam; Weisz, John R; The Research Network on Youth Mental Health
Note: Order does not necessarily reflect citation order of authors. |
| Citation: | Ebesutani, Chad, Adam Bernstein, Brad J. Nakamura, Bruce F. Chorpita, Charmaine K. Higa-McMillan, John R. Weisz, and The Research Network on Youth Mental Health. 2009. Concurrent validity of the child behavior checklist DSM-oriented scales: Correspondence with DSM diagnoses and comparison to syndrome scales. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment 32(3): 373-384. |
| Full Text & Related Files: |
2914253.pdf (198.4Kb; PDF)
|
| Abstract: | This study used receiver operating characteristic (ROC) methodology and discriminative analyses to examine the correspondence of the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) rationally-derived DSM-oriented scales and empirically-derived syndrome scales with clinical diagnoses in a clinic-referred sample of children and adolescents (N = 476). Although results demonstrated that the CBCL Anxiety, Affective, Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity, Oppositional and Conduct Problems DSM-oriented scales corresponded significantly with related clinical diagnoses derived from parent-based structured interviews, these DSM-oriented scales did not evidence significantly greater correspondence with clinical diagnoses than the syndrome scales in all cases but one. The DSM-oriented Anxiety Problems scale was the only scale that evidenced significantly greater correspondence with diagnoses above its syndrome scale counterpart —the Anxious/Depressed scale. The recently developed and rationally-derived DSM-oriented scales thus generally do not add incremental clinical utility above that already afforded by the syndrome scales with respect to corresponding with diagnoses. Implications of these findings are discussed. |
| Published Version: | doi:10.1007/s10862-009-9174-9 |
| Other Sources: | http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2914253/pdf/ |
| Terms of Use: | This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Open Access Policy Articles, as set forth at http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of-use#OAP |
| Citable link to this page: | http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:4460241 |
Contact administrator regarding this item (to report mistakes or request changes)