Prevalence and Factors Affecting Home Blood Pressure Documentation in Routine Clinical Care: a Retrospective Study

DSpace/Manakin Repository

Prevalence and Factors Affecting Home Blood Pressure Documentation in Routine Clinical Care: a Retrospective Study

Citable link to this page

. . . . . .

Title: Prevalence and Factors Affecting Home Blood Pressure Documentation in Routine Clinical Care: a Retrospective Study
Author: Shubina, Maria; Babcock, Kelly; Kramer, Michael H.; Breydo, Eugene; Einbinder, Jonathan Seth; Turchin, Alexander

Note: Order does not necessarily reflect citation order of authors.

Citation: Kramer, Michael H., Eugene Breydo, Maria Shubina, Kelly Babcock, Jonathan S. Einbinder, and Alexander Turchin. 2010. Prevalence and factors affecting home blood pressure documentation in routine clinical care: a retrospective study. BMC Health Services Research 10:139.
Full Text & Related Files:
Abstract: Background: Home blood pressure (BP) is closely linked to patient outcomes. However, the prevalence of its documentation has not been examined. The objective of this study was to analyze the prevalence and factors affecting documentation of home BP in routine clinical care. Methods: A retrospective study of 142,973 encounters of 9,840 hypertensive patients with diabetes from 2000 to 2005 was performed. The prevalence of recorded home BP and the factors associated with its documentation were analyzed. We assessed validity of home BP information by comparing the difference between home and office BP to previously published prospective studies. Results: Home BP was documented in narrative notes for 2.08% of encounters where any blood pressure was recorded and negligibly in structured data (EMR flowsheets). Systolic and diastolic home BP in narrative notes were lower than office BP readings by 9.6 and 2.5 mm Hg, respectively (p < 0.0001 for both), consistent with prospective data. Probability of home BP documentation increased by 23.0% for each 10 mm Hg of office systolic BP (p < 0.0001), by 6.2% for each $10,000 in median income of zip code (p = 0.0055), and by 17.7% for each decade in the patient's age (p < 0.0001). Conclusions: Home BP readings provide a valid representation of the patient's condition, yet are seldom documented despite their potential utility in both patient care and research. Strong association between higher patient income and home BP documentation suggests that the cost of the monitors may be a limiting factor; reimbursement of home BP monitoring expenses should be pursued.
Published Version: doi:10.1186/1472-6963-10-139
Other Sources: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2882386/pdf/
Terms of Use: This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of-use#LAA
Citable link to this page: http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:4632881

Show full Dublin Core record

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

 
 

Search DASH


Advanced Search
 
 

Submitters