Documentation of Body Mass Index and Control of Associated Risk Factors in a Large Primary Care Network

DSpace/Manakin Repository

Documentation of Body Mass Index and Control of Associated Risk Factors in a Large Primary Care Network

Citable link to this page

. . . . . .

Title: Documentation of Body Mass Index and Control of Associated Risk Factors in a Large Primary Care Network
Author: Rose, Stephanie A; Turchin, Alexander; Grant, Richard William; Meigs, James Benjamin

Note: Order does not necessarily reflect citation order of authors.

Citation: Rose, Stephanie A., Alexander Turchin, Richard W. Grant, and James B. Meigs. 2009. Documentation of body mass index and control of associated risk factors in a large primary care network. BMC Health Services Research 9: 236.
Full Text & Related Files:
Abstract: Background: Body mass index (BMI) will be a reportable health measure in the United States (US) through implementation of Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set (HEDIS) guidelines. We evaluated current documentation of BMI, and documentation and control of associated risk factors by BMI category, based on electronic health records from a 12-clinic primary care network. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of 79,947 active network patients greater than 18 years of age seen between 7/05 - 12/06. We defined BMI category as normal weight (NW, 18-24.9 kg/m2), overweight (OW, 25-29.9), and obese (OB, ≥ 30). We measured documentation (yes/no) and control (above/below) of the following three risk factors: blood pressure (BP) ≤130/≤85 mmHg, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) ≤130 mg/dL (3.367 mmol/L), and fasting glucose <100 mg/dL (5.55 mmol/L) or casual glucose <200 mg/dL (11.1 mmol/L). Results: BMI was documented in 48,376 patients (61%, range 34-94%), distributed as 30% OB, 34% OW, and 36% NW. Documentation of all three risk factors was higher in obesity (OB = 58%, OW = 54%, NW = 41%, p for trend <0.0001), but control of all three was lower (OB = 44%, OW = 49%, NW = 62%, p = 0.0001). The presence of cardiovascular disease (CVD) or diabetes modified some associations with obesity, and OB patients with CVD or diabetes had low rates of control of all three risk factors (CVD: OB = 49%, OW = 50%, NW = 56%; diabetes: OB = 42%, OW = 47%, NW = 48%, p < 0.0001 for adiposity-CVD or diabetes interaction). Conclusions: In a large primary care network BMI documentation has been incomplete and for patients with BMI measured, risk factor control has been poorer in obese patients compared with NW, even in those with obesity and CVD or diabetes. Better knowledge of BMI could provide an opportunity for improved quality in obesity care.
Published Version: doi:10.1186/1472-6963-9-236
Other Sources: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2811109/pdf/
Terms of Use: This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of-use#LAA
Citable link to this page: http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:4725503

Show full Dublin Core record

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

 
 

Search DASH


Advanced Search
 
 

Submitters