Hierarchy of Nonhomologous End-joining, Single-strand Annealing and Gene Conversion at Site-directed DNA Double-strand Breaks

DSpace/Manakin Repository

Hierarchy of Nonhomologous End-joining, Single-strand Annealing and Gene Conversion at Site-directed DNA Double-strand Breaks

Citable link to this page

. . . . . .

Title: Hierarchy of Nonhomologous End-joining, Single-strand Annealing and Gene Conversion at Site-directed DNA Double-strand Breaks
Author: Mansour, Wael Y.; Schumacher, Sabine; Rosskopf, Raphael; Rhein, Tim; Schmidt-Petersen, Filip; Gatzemeier, Fruszina; Haag, Friedrich; Borgmann, Kerstin; Dahm-Daphi, Jochen; Willers, Henning

Note: Order does not necessarily reflect citation order of authors.

Citation: Mansour, Wael Y., Sabine Schumacher, Raphael Rosskopf, Tim Rhein, Filip Schmidt-Petersen, Fruszina Gatzemeier, Friedrich Haag, Kerstin Borgmann, Henning Willers, and Jochen Dahm-Daphi. 2008. Hierarchy of nonhomologous end-joining, single-strand annealing and gene conversion at site-directed DNA double-strand breaks. Nucleic Acids Research 36(12): 4088-4098.
Full Text & Related Files:
Abstract: In mammalian cells, DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are repaired by three pathways, nonhomologous end-joining (NHEJ), gene conversion (GC) and single-strand annealing (SSA). These pathways are distinct with regard to repair efficiency and mutagenic potential and must be tightly controlled to preserve viability and genomic stability. Here, we employed chromosomal reporter constructs to characterize the hierarchy of NHEJ, GC and SSA at a single I-SceI-induced DSB in Chinese hamster ovary cells. We discovered that the use of GC and SSA was increased by 6- to 8-fold upon loss of Ku80 function, suggesting that NHEJ is dominant over the other two pathways. However, NHEJ efficiency was not altered if GC was impaired by Rad51 knockdown. Interestingly, when SSA was made available as an alternative mode for DSB repair, loss of Rad51 function led to an increase in SSA activity at the expense of NHEJ, implying that Rad51 may indirectly promote NHEJ by limiting SSA. We conclude that a repair hierarchy exists to limit the access of the most mutagenic mechanism, SSA, to the break site. Furthermore, the cellular choice of repair pathways is reversible and can be influenced at the level of effector proteins such as Ku80 or Rad51.
Published Version: doi:10.1093/nar/gkn347
Other Sources: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2475611/pdf/
Terms of Use: This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of-use#LAA
Citable link to this page: http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:4725510

Show full Dublin Core record

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

 
 

Search DASH


Advanced Search
 
 

Submitters