Agent Decision-Making in Open Mixed Networks

DSpace/Manakin Repository

Agent Decision-Making in Open Mixed Networks

Citable link to this page

. . . . . .

Title: Agent Decision-Making in Open Mixed Networks
Author: Gal, Ya'akov; Grosz, Barbara J.; Kraus, Sarit; Shieber, Stuart M.

Note: Order does not necessarily reflect citation order of authors.

Citation: Ya'akov Gal, Barbara Grosz, Sarit Kraus, Avi Pfeffer, and Stuart Shieber. 2010. Agent decision-making in open mixed networks. Artificial Intelligence 174(18): 1460-1480.
Full Text & Related Files:
Abstract: Computer systems increasingly carry out tasks in mixed networks, that is in group settings in which they interact both with other computer systems and with people. Participants in these heterogeneous human-computer groups vary in their capabilities, goals, and strategies; they may cooperate, collaborate, or compete. The presence of people in mixed networks raises challenges for the design and the evaluation of decision-making strategies for computer agents. This paper describes several new decision-making models that represent, learn and adapt to various social attributes that influence people's decision-making and presents a novel approach to evaluating such models. It identifies a range of social attributes in an open-network setting that influence people's decision-making and thus affect the performance of computer-agent strategies, and establishes the importance of learning and adaptation to the success of such strategies. The settings vary in the capabilities, goals, and strategies that people bring into their interactions. The studies deploy a configurable system called Colored Trails (CT) that generates a family of games. CT is an abstract, conceptually simple but highly versatile game in which players negotiate and exchange resources to enable them to achieve their individual or group goals. It provides a realistic analogue to multi-agent task domains, while not requiring extensive domain modeling. It is less abstract than payoff matrices, and people exhibit less strategic and more helpful behavior in CT than in the identical payoff matrix decision-making context. By not requiring extensive domain modeling, CT enables agent researchers to focus their attention on strategy design, and it provides an environment in which the influence of social factors can be better isolated and studied.
Published Version: doi:10.1016/j.artint.2010.09.002
Terms of Use: This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Open Access Policy Articles, as set forth at http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of-use#OAP
Citable link to this page: http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:4726287

Show full Dublin Core record

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • FAS Scholarly Articles [7587]
    Peer reviewed scholarly articles from the Faculty of Arts and Sciences of Harvard University
 
 

Search DASH


Advanced Search
 
 

Submitters