Penetrating Abdominal Injuries: Management Controversies

DSpace/Manakin Repository

Penetrating Abdominal Injuries: Management Controversies

Citable link to this page

. . . . . .

Title: Penetrating Abdominal Injuries: Management Controversies
Author: Zacharias, Nikolaos; Butt, Muhammad Umar; Velmahos, George

Note: Order does not necessarily reflect citation order of authors.

Citation: Butt, Muhammad U., Nikolaos Zacharias, and George C. Velmahos. 2009. Penetrating abdominal injuries: management controversies. Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine 17: 19.
Full Text & Related Files:
Abstract: Penetrating abdominal injuries have been traditionally managed by routine laparotomy. New understanding of trajectories, potential for organ injury, and correlation with advanced radiographic imaging has allowed a shift towards non-operative management of appropriate cases. Although a selective approach has been established for stab wounds, the management of abdominal gunshot wounds remains a matter of controversy. In this chapter we describe the rationale and methodology of selecting patients for non-operative management. We also discuss additional controversial issues, as related to antibiotic prophylaxis, management of asymptomatic thoracoabdominal injuries, and the use of colostomy vs. primary repair for colon injuries.
Published Version: doi://10.1186/1757-7241-17-19
Other Sources: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2674409/pdf/
Terms of Use: This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of-use#LAA
Citable link to this page: http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:4727703

Show full Dublin Core record

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

 
 

Search DASH


Advanced Search
 
 

Submitters