Pseudorandom Generators without the XOR Lemma

DSpace/Manakin Repository

Pseudorandom Generators without the XOR Lemma

Citable link to this page

. . . . . .

Title: Pseudorandom Generators without the XOR Lemma
Author: Trevisan, Luca; Sudan, Madhu; Vadhan, Salil P.; sudan

Note: Order does not necessarily reflect citation order of authors.

Citation: Sudan, Madhu, Luca Trevisan, and Salil Vadhan. 2001. Pseudorandom generators without the XOR lemma. Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 62 (2):236-266.
Full Text & Related Files:
Abstract: Impagliazzo and Wigderson have recently shown that if there exists a decision problem solvable in time 2^{O(n)} and having circuit complexity 2^{Omega(n)} (for all but finitely many n) then P=BPP. This result is a culmination of a series of works showing connections between the existence of hard predicates and the existence of good pseudorandom generators. The construction of Impagliazzo and Wigderson goes through three phases of "hardness amplification" (a multivariate polynomial encoding, a first derandomized XOR Lemma, and a second derandomized XOR Lemma) that are composed with the Nisan-Wigderson generator. In this paper we present two different approaches to proving the main result of Impagliazzo and Wigderson. In developing each approach, we introduce new techniques and prove new results that could be useful in future improvements and/or applications of hardness-randomness trade-offs. Our first result is that when (a modified version of) the Nisan-Wigderson generator construction is applied with a "mildly" hard predicate, the result is a generator that produces a distribution indistinguishable from having large min-entropy. An extractor can then be used to produce a distribution computationally indistinguishable from uniform. This is the first construction of a pseudorandom generator that works with a mildly hard predicate without doing hardness amplification. We then show that in the Impagliazzo-Wigderson construction only the first hardness-amplification phase (encoding with multivariate polynomial) is necessary, since it already gives the required average-case hardness. We prove this result by (i) establishing a connection between the hardness-amplification problem and a list-decoding problem for error-correcting codes; and (ii) presenting a list-decoding algorithm for error-correcting codes based on multivariate polynomials that improves and simplifies a previous one by Arora and Sudan.
Published Version: http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jcss.2000.1730
Terms of Use: This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of-use#LAA
Citable link to this page: http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:4728405

Show full Dublin Core record

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • FAS Scholarly Articles [7106]
    Peer reviewed scholarly articles from the Faculty of Arts and Sciences of Harvard University
 
 

Search DASH


Advanced Search
 
 

Submitters