Comparative Power Spectral Analysis of Simultaneous Elecroencephalographic and Magnetoencephalographic Recordings in Humans Suggests Non-Resistive Extracellular Media

DSpace/Manakin Repository

Comparative Power Spectral Analysis of Simultaneous Elecroencephalographic and Magnetoencephalographic Recordings in Humans Suggests Non-Resistive Extracellular Media

Citable link to this page

. . . . . .

Title: Comparative Power Spectral Analysis of Simultaneous Elecroencephalographic and Magnetoencephalographic Recordings in Humans Suggests Non-Resistive Extracellular Media
Author: Dehghani, Nima; Bédard, Claude; Halgren, Eric; Destexhe, Alain; Cash, Sydney S.

Note: Order does not necessarily reflect citation order of authors.

Citation: Dehghani, Nima, Claude Bédard, Sydney S. Cash, Eric Halgren, and Alain Destexhe. 2010. Comparative power spectral analysis of simultaneous elecroencephalographic and magnetoencephalographic recordings in humans suggests non-resistive extracellular media. Journal of Computational Neuroscience 29(3): 405-421.
Full Text & Related Files:
Abstract: The resistive or non-resistive nature of the extracellular space in the brain is still debated, and is an important issue for correctly modeling extracellular potentials. Here, we first show theoretically that if the medium is resistive, the frequency scaling should be the same for electroencephalogram (EEG) and magnetoencephalogram (MEG) signals at low frequencies (less than 10 Hz). To test this prediction, we analyzed the spectrum of simultaneous EEG and MEG measurements in four human subjects. The frequency scaling of EEG displays coherent variations across the brain, in general between 1/f and 1/f2, and tends to be smaller in parietal/temporal regions. In a given region, although the variability of the frequency scaling exponent was higher for MEG compared to EEG, both signals consistently scale with a different exponent. In some cases, the scaling was similar, but only when the signal-to-noise ratio of the MEG was low. Several methods of noise correction for environmental and instrumental noise were tested, and they all increased the difference between EEG and MEG scaling. In conclusion, there is a significant difference in frequency scaling between EEG and MEG, which can be explained if the extracellular medium (including other layers such as dura matter and skull) is globally non-resistive.
Published Version: doi:10.1007/s10827-010-0263-2
Other Sources: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2978899/pdf/
Terms of Use: This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of-use#LAA
Citable link to this page: http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:4743817

Show full Dublin Core record

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

 
 

Search DASH


Advanced Search
 
 

Submitters