A Randomized Trial Assessing the Clinical Efficacy and Microbial Eradication of 1% Azithromycin Ophthalmic Solution vs Tobramycin in Adult and Pediatric Subjects with Bacterial Conjunctivitis

DSpace/Manakin Repository

A Randomized Trial Assessing the Clinical Efficacy and Microbial Eradication of 1% Azithromycin Ophthalmic Solution vs Tobramycin in Adult and Pediatric Subjects with Bacterial Conjunctivitis

Citable link to this page

. . . . . .

Title: A Randomized Trial Assessing the Clinical Efficacy and Microbial Eradication of 1% Azithromycin Ophthalmic Solution vs Tobramycin in Adult and Pediatric Subjects with Bacterial Conjunctivitis
Author: Protzko, Eugene; Shapiro, Aron; Garces-Soldana, Ana; Bowman, Lyle; Abelson, Mark Barry

Note: Order does not necessarily reflect citation order of authors.

Citation: Abelson, Mark, Eugene Protzko, Aron Shapiro, Ana Garces-Soldana, and Lyle Bowman. 2007. A randomized trial assessing the clinical efficacy and microbial eradication of 1% azithromycin ophthalmic solution vs tobramycin in adult and pediatric subjects with bacterial conjunctivitis. Clinical Ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) 1(2): 177-182.
Full Text & Related Files:
Abstract: Objective: The study was designed to evaluate the efficacy of an ophthalmic formulation of 1% azithromycin in DuraSite® (AzaSite™, InSite Vision, Alameda CA, USA) and demonstrate equivalence with 0.3% tobramycin ophthalmic solution, USP, for the treatment of bacterial conjunctivitis as defined by the resolution of clinical signs and the eradication of pathogens. Design: Prospective, randomized, active-controlled, double-masked, phase 3 trial conducted at 47 US sites between 6 August 2004 and 6 October 2005. Participants: Subjects aged 1 year or older with diagnosis of acute bacterial conjunctivitis. Methods: Bacteriologically confirmed participants received either 1% azithromycin in Dura-Site (n = 159) or tobramycin (n = 157). Masked study medications were dosed 4 times a day for 5 days. Participants in the 1% azithromycin in DuraSite group were dosed twice a day with active drug on days 1 and 2 and once daily on days 3 through 5. The other doses were vehicle. Clinical signs and bacterial cultures were evaluated at visit 3 (day 6 + 1). Results: Clinical resolution was observed in 79.9% of participants in the 1% azithromycin in DuraSite group, as compared with 78.3% of those in the tobramycin group (95% CI: −7.4–10.5). Bacterial eradication was 88.1% in the 1% azithromycin in DuraSite group vs 94.3% in the tobramycin group (95% CI: −12.4–0.0). Analyses of resistance confirmed that 1% azithromycin in DuraSite eradicated Staphylococci and Streptococci strains that are commonly resistant to azithromycin, erythromycin, and fluoroquinolones. Conclusions: The efficacy of 1% azithromycin in DuraSite and tobramycin are equivalent; however, this formulation of azithromycin also permits effective dosing intervals of twice a day on days 1 and 2 followed by once daily on the last 3 days of therapy, for a total of 65% fewer doses. In vitro, the killing spectrum of 1% azithromycin in DuraSite appears to be enhanced relative to 1% azithromycin without DuraSite.
Other Sources: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2704516/pdf/
Terms of Use: This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of-use#LAA
Citable link to this page: http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:4875883

Show full Dublin Core record

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

 
 

Search DASH


Advanced Search
 
 

Submitters