A Research Algorithm to Improve Detection of Delirium in the Intensive Care Unit

DSpace/Manakin Repository

A Research Algorithm to Improve Detection of Delirium in the Intensive Care Unit

Citable link to this page

. . . . . .

Title: A Research Algorithm to Improve Detection of Delirium in the Intensive Care Unit
Author: Pisani, Margaret A; Araujo, Katy LB; Van Ness, Peter H; Ely, E Wesley; Zhang, Ying; Inouye, Sharon

Note: Order does not necessarily reflect citation order of authors.

Citation: Pisani, Margaret A., Katy L. B. Araujo, Peter H. Van Ness, Ying Zhang, E. Wesley Ely, and Sharon K. Inouye. 2006. A research algorithm to improve detection of delirium in the intensive care unit. Critical Care 10(4): R121.
Full Text & Related Files:
Abstract: Introduction: Delirium is a serious and prevalent problem in intensive care units (ICUs). The purpose of this study was to develop a research algorithm to enhance detection of delirium in critically ill ICU patients using chart review to complement a validated clinical delirium instrument. Methods: A prospective cohort study was conducted in 178 patients aged 60 years and older who were admitted to the medical ICU. The Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU (CAM-ICU) and a validated chart review method for detecting delirium were performed daily. We assessed the diagnostic accuracy of the chart-based delirium method using the CAM-ICU as the 'gold standard'. We then used an algorithm to detect delirium first using the CAM-ICU ratings and then chart review when the CAM-ICU was unavailable. Results: When using both the CAM-ICU and the chart-based review, the prevalence of delirium was found to be 80% of patients (143 out of 178) or 64% of patient-days (929 out of 1,457). Of these patient-days, 292 were classified as delirium by the CAM-ICU. The remainder (637 patient-days) were classified as delirium by the validated chart review method when CAM-ICU was missing because the assessment was conducted for weekends or holidays (404 patient-days), when CAM-ICU was not performed because of stupor or coma (205 patient-days), and when the CAM-ICU was negative (28 patient-days). Sensitivity of the chart-based method was 64% and specificity was 85%. Overall agreement between chart and the CAM-ICU was 72%. Conclusion: Eight out of 10 patients in this cohort study developed delirium in the ICU. Although use of a validated delirium instrument with frequent direct observations is recommended for clinical care, this approach may not always be feasible, especially in a research setting. The algorithm proposed here comprises a more comprehensive method for detecting delirium in a research setting, taking into account the fluctuation that occurs with delirium, which is a key component of accurate determination of delirium status. Improving detection of delirium is of paramount importance both to advance delirium research and to enhance clinical care and patient safety.
Published Version: doi:10.1186/cc5027
Other Sources: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1750978/pdf/
Terms of Use: This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of-use#LAA
Citable link to this page: http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:4878058

Show full Dublin Core record

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

 
 

Search DASH


Advanced Search
 
 

Submitters