Workgroup Report: Workshop on Source Apportionment of Particulate Matter Health Effects—Intercomparison of Results and Implications

DSpace/Manakin Repository

Workgroup Report: Workshop on Source Apportionment of Particulate Matter Health Effects—Intercomparison of Results and Implications

Citable link to this page

. . . . . .

Title: Workgroup Report: Workshop on Source Apportionment of Particulate Matter Health Effects—Intercomparison of Results and Implications
Author: Thurston, George D.; Ito, Kazuhiko; Mar, Therese; Christensen, William F.; Eatough, Delbert J.; Henry, Ronald C.; Lall, Ramona; Larson, Timothy V.; Neas, Lucas; Pinto, Joseph; Stölzel, Matthias; Hopke, Philip K.; Kim, Eugene; Laden, Francine; Liu, Hao; Suh MacIntosh, Helen H.

Note: Order does not necessarily reflect citation order of authors.

Citation: Thurston, George D., Kazuhiko Ito, Therese Mar, William F. Christensen, Delbert J. Eatough, Ronald C. Henry, Eugene Kim, et al. 2005. Workgroup report: Workshop on source apportionment of particulate matter health Effects - A intercomparison of results and implications. Environmental Health Perspectives 113(12): 1768-1774.
Full Text & Related Files:
Abstract: Although the association between exposure to ambient fine particulate matter with aerodynamic diameter < 2.5 μm (PM\(_{2.5}\)) and human mortality is well established, the most responsible particle types/sources are not yet certain. In May 2003, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s Particulate Matter Centers Program sponsored the Workshop on the Source Apportionment of PM Health Effects. The goal was to evaluate the consistency of the various source apportionment methods in assessing source contributions to daily PM\(_{2.5}\) mass–mortality associations. Seven research institutions, using varying methods, participated in the estimation of source apportionments of PM\(_{2.5}\) mass samples collected in Washington, DC, and Phoenix, Arizona, USA. Apportionments were evaluated for their respective associations with mortality using Poisson regressions, allowing a comparative assessment of the extent to which variations in the apportionments contributed to variability in the source-specific mortality results. The various research groups generally identified the same major source types, each with similar elemental makeups. Intergroup correlation analyses indicated that soil-, sulfate-, residual oil-, and salt-associated mass were most unambiguously identified by various methods, whereas vegetative burning and traffic were less consistent. Aggregate source-specific mortality relative risk (RR) estimate confidence intervals overlapped each other, but the sulfate-related PM\(_{2.5}\) component was most consistently significant across analyses in these cities. Analyses indicated that source types were a significant predictor of RR, whereas apportionment group differences were not. Variations in the source apportionments added only some 15% to the mortality regression uncertainties. These results provide supportive evidence that existing PM\(_{2.5}\) source apportionment methods can be used to derive reliable insights into the source components that contribute to PM\(_{2.5}\) health effects.
Published Version: doi:10.1289/ehp.7989
Other Sources: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1314918/pdf/
Terms of Use: This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of-use#LAA
Citable link to this page: http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:4889496

Show full Dublin Core record

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

 
 

Search DASH


Advanced Search
 
 

Submitters