Cost-Effectiveness of Preventing Loss to Follow-up in HIV Treatment Programs: A Côte d'Ivoire Appraisal
DSpace/Manakin Repository
Cost-Effectiveness of Preventing Loss to Follow-up in HIV Treatment Programs: A Côte d'Ivoire Appraisal
| Title: | Cost-Effectiveness of Preventing Loss to Follow-up in HIV Treatment Programs: A Côte d'Ivoire Appraisal |
| Author: |
Touré, Hapsatou; Uhler, Lauren M.; Anglaret, Xavier; Paltiel, A. David; Balestre, Eric; Messou, Eugène; Dabis, François; Losina, Elena; Walensky, Rochelle P.; Weinstein, Milton C.; Freedberg, Kenneth Alan
Note: Order does not necessarily reflect citation order of authors. |
| Citation: | Losina, Elena, Hapsatou Touré, Lauren M. Uhler, Xavier Anglaret, A. David Paltiel, Eric Balestre, Rochelle P. Walensky, et al. 2009. Cost-effectiveness of preventing loss to follow-up in HIV treatment programs: A Côte d'Ivoire appraisal. PLoS Medicine 6(10): e1000173. |
| Full Text & Related Files: |
2762030.pdf (429.6Kb; PDF) 
|
| Abstract: | Background: Data from HIV treatment programs in resource-limited settings show extensive rates of loss to follow-up (LTFU) ranging from 5% to 40% within 6 mo of antiretroviral therapy (ART) initiation. Our objective was to project the clinical impact and cost-effectiveness of interventions to prevent LTFU from HIV care in West Africa. Methods and Findings: We used the Cost-Effectiveness of Preventing AIDS Complications (CEPAC) International model to project the clinical benefits and cost-effectiveness of LTFU-prevention programs from a payer perspective. These programs include components such as eliminating ART co-payments, eliminating charges to patients for opportunistic infectionrelated drugs, improving personnel training, and providing meals and reimbursing for transportation for participants. The efficacies and costs of these interventions were extensively varied in sensitivity analyses. We used World Health Organization criteria of ,36 gross domestic product per capita (36 GDP per capita = US$2,823 for Coˆ te d’Ivoire) as a plausible threshold for ‘‘cost-effectiveness.’’ The main results are based on a reported 18% 1-y LTFU rate. With full retention in care, projected per-person discounted life expectancy starting from age 37 y was 144.7 mo (12.1 y). Survival losses from LTFU within 1 y of ART initiation ranged from 73.9 to 80.7 mo. The intervention costing US$22/person/year (e.g., eliminating ART co-payment) would be cost-effective with an efficacy of at least 12%. An intervention costing US$77/person/year (inclusive of all the components described above) would be cost-effective with an efficacy of at least 41%. Conclusions: Interventions that prevent LTFU in resource-limited settings would substantially improve survival and would be cost-effective by international criteria with efficacy of at least 12%–41%, depending on the cost of intervention, based on a reported 18% cumulative incidence of LTFU at 1 y after ART initiation. The commitment to start ART and treat HIV in these settings should include interventions to prevent LTFU. |
| Published Version: | doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000173 |
| Other Sources: | http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2762030/pdf/ |
| Terms of Use: | This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of-use#LAA |
| Citable link to this page: | http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:4889584 |
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
-
HSPH Scholarly Articles [1280]
-
HMS Scholarly Articles [4020]
Contact administrator regarding this item (to report mistakes or request changes)
