Dose Volume Histogram Analysis of Normal Structures Associated with Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation Delivered by High Dose Rate Brachytherapy and Comparison with Whole Breast External Beam Radiotherapy Fields

DSpace/Manakin Repository

Dose Volume Histogram Analysis of Normal Structures Associated with Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation Delivered by High Dose Rate Brachytherapy and Comparison with Whole Breast External Beam Radiotherapy Fields

Citable link to this page

. . . . . .

Title: Dose Volume Histogram Analysis of Normal Structures Associated with Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation Delivered by High Dose Rate Brachytherapy and Comparison with Whole Breast External Beam Radiotherapy Fields
Author: Stewart, Alexandra J; O'Farrell, Desmond A; Mutyala, Subhakar; Cormack, Robert A.; Hansen, Jorgen Lindberg; Devlin, Phillip M.; Khan, Atif J.

Note: Order does not necessarily reflect citation order of authors.

Citation: Stewart, Alexandra J., Desmond A. O'Farrell, Robert A. Cormack, Jorgen L. Hansen, Atif J. Khan, Subhakar Mutyala, and Phillip M. Devlin. 2008. Dose volume histogram analysis of normal structures associated with accelerated partial breast irradiation delivered by high dose rate brachytherapy and comparison with whole breast external beam radiotherapy fields. Radiation Oncology 3:39.
Full Text & Related Files:
Abstract: Purpose: To assess the radiation dose delivered to the heart and ipsilateral lung during accelerated partial breast brachytherapy using a MammoSite™ applicator and compare to those produced by whole breast external beam radiotherapy (WBRT). Materials and methods: Dosimetric analysis was conducted on patients receiving MammoSite breast brachytherapy following conservative surgery for invasive ductal carcinoma. Cardiac dose was evaluated for patients with left breast tumors with a CT scan encompassing the entire heart. Lung dose was evaluated for patients in whom the entire lung was scanned. The prescription dose of 3400 cGy was 1 cm from the balloon surface. MammoSite dosimetry was compared to simulated WBRT fields with and without radiobiological correction for the effects of dose and fractionation. Dose parameters such as the volume of the structure receiving 10 Gy or more (V10) and the dose received by 20 cc of the structure (D20), were calculated as well as the maximum and mean doses received. Results: Fifteen patients were studied, five had complete lung data and six had left-sided tumors with complete cardiac data. Ipsilateral lung volumes ranged from 925–1380 cc. Cardiac volumes ranged from 337–551 cc. MammoSite resulted in a significantly lower percentage lung V30 and lung and cardiac V20 than the WBRT fields, with and without radiobiological correction. Conclusion: This study gives low values for incidental radiation received by the heart and ipsilateral lung using the MammoSite applicator. The volume of heart and lung irradiated to clinically significant levels was significantly lower with the MammoSite applicator than using simulated WBRT fields of the same CT data sets. Trial registration: Dana Farber Trial Registry number 03-179
Published Version: doi:10.1186/1748-717X-3-39
Other Sources: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2612673/pdf/
Terms of Use: This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of-use#LAA
Citable link to this page: http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:4911887

Show full Dublin Core record

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

 
 

Search DASH


Advanced Search
 
 

Submitters