Dilatant Strengthening as a Mechanism for Slow Slip Events

DSpace/Manakin Repository

Dilatant Strengthening as a Mechanism for Slow Slip Events

Citable link to this page

. . . . . .

Title: Dilatant Strengthening as a Mechanism for Slow Slip Events
Author: Rice, James R.; Segall, Paul; Rubin, Allan M.; Bradley, Andrew M.

Note: Order does not necessarily reflect citation order of authors.

Citation: Segall, Paul, Allan M. Rubin, Andrew M. Bradley, and James R. Rice. 2010. Dilatant strengthening as a mechanism for slow slip events. Journal of Geophysical Research 115:B12305.
Full Text & Related Files:
Abstract: The mechanics of slow slip events (SSE) in subduction zones remain unresolved. We suggest that SSE nucleate in areas of unstable friction under drained conditions, but as slip accelerates dilatancy reduces pore pressure \(p\) quenching instability. Competition between dilatant strengthening and thermal pressurization may control whether slip is slow or fast. We model SSE with 2‐D elasticity, rate-state friction, and a dilatancy law where porosity \(\phi\) evolves toward steady state \(\phi_{ss}\) over distance \(d_c\) and \(\phi_{ss}=\phi_0+\epsilon ln(v/v_0)\); \(v\) is slip speed. We consider two diffusion models. Membrane diffusion (MD) is approximated by \(-(p-p^{\infty})/t_f\) where \(p\) and \(p^{\infty}\) are shear zone and remote pore pressure and \(t_f\) is a characteristic diffusion time. Homogeneous diffusion (HD) accurately models fault-normal flow with diffusivity \(C_{hyd}\). For MD, linearized analysis defines a boundary \(\epsilon \equiv 1-a/b\) between slow and fast slip, where \(\epsilon \equiv f_0 \epsilon /\beta b(\sigma-p^{\infty})\), \(f_0\), \(a\), and \(b\) are friction parameters and \(\beta\) is compressibility. When \(\epsilon < 1-a/b\) slip accelerates to instability for sufficiently large faults, whereas for \(\epsilon > 1-a/b\) slip speeds remain quasi-static. For \(HD\), \(E_p\equiv \epsilon h/(\beta (\sigma-p^{\infty})\sqrt{v^\infty / C_{hyd}d_c} )\) defines dilatancy efficiency, where \(h\) is shear zone thickness and \(v^{\infty}\) is plate viscosity. SSE are favored by large \(\epsilon h\) and low effective stress. The ratio \(E_p\) to thermal pressurization efficiency scales with \(1/(\sigma - p^{\infty})\), so high \(p^{\infty}\) favors SSE, consistent with seismic observations. Model updip propagation speeds are comparable to those observed along-strike. Many simulations exhibit slow phases driven by steady downdip slip and faster phases that relax the accumulated stress. Model SSE accomodate only a fraction of pale motion; the remaining deficit must be accommodated during coseismic or postseismic slip.
Published Version: doi:10.1029/2010JB007449
Terms of Use: This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of-use#LAA
Citable link to this page: http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:5026690

Show full Dublin Core record

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • FAS Scholarly Articles [7374]
    Peer reviewed scholarly articles from the Faculty of Arts and Sciences of Harvard University
 
 

Search DASH


Advanced Search
 
 

Submitters