No Evidence of Short-Term Exchange of Meat for Sex among Chimpanzees

DSpace/Manakin Repository

No Evidence of Short-Term Exchange of Meat for Sex among Chimpanzees

Citable link to this page

. . . . . .

Title: No Evidence of Short-Term Exchange of Meat for Sex among Chimpanzees
Author: Gilby, Ian C.; Emery Thompson, M; Ruane, Jonathan D.; Wrangham, Richard W.

Note: Order does not necessarily reflect citation order of authors.

Citation: Gilby, Ian C., M. Emery Thompson, Jonathan D. Ruane, and Richard W. Wrangham. 2010. No evidence of short-term exchange of meat for sex among chimpanzees. Journal of Human Evolution 59(1): 44-53.
Full Text & Related Files:
Abstract: The meat-for-sex hypothesis posits that male chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) trade meat with estrous females in exchange for short-term mating access. This notion is widely cited in the anthropological literature and has been used to construct scenarios about human evolution. Here we review the theoretical and empirical basis for the meat-for-sex hypothesis. We argue that chimpanzee behavioral ecology does not favor the evolution of such exchanges because 1) female chimpanzees show low mate selectivity and require little or no material incentive to mate, violating existing models of meat-for-sex exchange; and 2) meat-for-sex exchanges are unlikely to provide reproductive benefits to either partner. We also present new analyses of 28 years of data from two East African chimpanzee study sites (Gombe National Park, Tanzania; Kanyawara, Kibale National Park, Uganda) and discuss the results of previously published studies. In at least three chimpanzee communities, 1) the presence of sexually receptive females did not increase hunting probability; 2) males did not share preferentially with sexually receptive females and 3) sharing with females did not increase a male’s short-term mating success. We acknowledge that systematic meat-sharing by male chimpanzees in expectation of or as reward for immediate copulations might be discovered in future studies of chimpanzees. However current data indicate that such exchanges are so rare in studied populations, and are so different in nature from exchanges among humans, that with respect to chimpanzees, sexual bartering in humans should be regarded as a derived trait with no known antecedents in the behavior of wild chimpanzees.
Published Version: doi:10.1016/j.jhevol.2010.02.006
Other Sources: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20493515
Terms of Use: This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Open Access Policy Articles, as set forth at http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of-use#OAP
Citable link to this page: http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:5346654

Show full Dublin Core record

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • FAS Scholarly Articles [7106]
    Peer reviewed scholarly articles from the Faculty of Arts and Sciences of Harvard University
 
 

Search DASH


Advanced Search
 
 

Submitters