High Quality Care and Ethical Pay-for-performance: A Society of General Internal Medicine Policy Analysis

DSpace/Manakin Repository

High Quality Care and Ethical Pay-for-performance: A Society of General Internal Medicine Policy Analysis

Citable link to this page

. . . . . .

Title: High Quality Care and Ethical Pay-for-performance: A Society of General Internal Medicine Policy Analysis
Author: Paasche-Orlow, Michael K.; Farber, Neil J.; Sinsky, Christine; Rucker, Lisa; Rask, Kimberly J.; Figaro, M. Kathleen; Braddock, Clarence; Sulmasy, Daniel P.; Wharam, James Franklin; Barry, Michael John

Note: Order does not necessarily reflect citation order of authors.

Citation: Wharam, J. Frank, Michael K. Paasche-Orlow, Neil J. Farber, Christine Sinsky, Lisa Rucker, Kimberly J. Rask, M. Kathleen Figaro, Clarence Braddock, Michael J. Barry, and Daniel P. Sulmasy. 2009. High quality care and ethical pay-for-performance: a society of general internal medicine policy analysis. Journal of General Internal Medicine 24(7): 854-859.
Full Text & Related Files:
Abstract: BACKGROUND: Pay-for-performance is proliferating, yet its impact on key stakeholders remains uncertain. OBJECTIVE: The Society of General Internal Medicine systematically evaluated ethical issues raised by performance-based physician compensation. RESULTS: We conclude that current arrangements are based on fundamentally acceptable ethical principles, but are guided by an incomplete understanding of health-care quality. Furthermore, their implementation without evidence of safety and efficacy is ethically precarious because of potential risks to stakeholders, especially vulnerable patients. CONCLUSION: We propose four major strategies to transition from risky pay-for-performance systems to ethical performance-based physician compensation and high quality care. These include implementing safeguards within current pay-for-performance systems, reaching consensus regarding the obligations of key stakeholders in improving health-care quality, developing valid and comprehensive measures of health-care quality, and utilizing a cautious evaluative approach in creating the next generation of compensation systems that reward genuine quality.
Published Version: doi://10.1007/s11606-009-0947-3
Other Sources: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2695523/pdf/
Terms of Use: This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of-use#LAA
Citable link to this page: http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:5346784

Show full Dublin Core record

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

 
 

Search DASH


Advanced Search
 
 

Submitters