Lumping or Splitting: Seeking the Preferred Areal Unit for Health Geography Studies

DSpace/Manakin Repository

Lumping or Splitting: Seeking the Preferred Areal Unit for Health Geography Studies

Citable link to this page

. . . . . .

Title: Lumping or Splitting: Seeking the Preferred Areal Unit for Health Geography Studies
Author: Gregorio, David I; DeChello, Laurie M; Samociuk, Holly; Kulldorff, Martin

Note: Order does not necessarily reflect citation order of authors.

Citation: Gregorio, David I., Laurie M. DeChello, Holly Samociuk, and Martin Kulldorff. 2005. Lumping or splitting: Seeking the preferred areal unit for health geography studies. International Journal of Health Geographics 4: 6.
Full Text & Related Files:
Abstract: Background Findings are compared on geographic variation of incident and late-stage cancers across Connecticut using different areal units for analysis.Results Few differences in results were found for analyses across areal units. Global clustering of incident prostate and breast cancer cases was apparent regardless of the level of geography used. The test for local clustering found approximately the same locales, populations at risk and estimated effects. However, some discrepancies were uncovered.Conclusion In the absence of conditions calling for surveillance of small area cancer clusters ('hot spots'), the rationale for accepting the burdens of preparing data at levels of geography finer than the census tract may not be compelling.
Published Version: doi: 10.1186/1476-072X-4-6
Other Sources: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1079921/pdf/
Terms of Use: This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of-use#LAA
Citable link to this page: http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:8148890

Show full Dublin Core record

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

 
 

Search DASH


Advanced Search
 
 

Submitters