Kidney Development in the Absence of Gdnf and Spry1 Requires Fgf10

DSpace/Manakin Repository

Kidney Development in the Absence of Gdnf and Spry1 Requires Fgf10

Citable link to this page

. . . . . .

Title: Kidney Development in the Absence of Gdnf and Spry1 Requires Fgf10
Author: Michos, Odyssé; Cebrian, Cristina; Hyink, Deborah; Grieshammer, Uta; D'Agati, Vivette; Licht, Jonathan D.; Martin, Gail R.; Costantini, Frank; Williams, Linda

Note: Order does not necessarily reflect citation order of authors.

Citation: Michos, Odyssé, Cristina Cebrian, Deborah Hyink, Uta Grieshammer, Linda Williams, Vivette D'Agati, Jonathan D. Licht, Gail R. Martin, and Frank Costantini. 2010. Kidney development in the absence of Gdnf and Spry1 requires Fgf10. PLoS Genetics 6(1): e1000809.
Full Text & Related Files:
Abstract: GDNF signaling through the Ret receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) is required for ureteric bud (UB) branching morphogenesis during kidney development in mice and humans. Furthermore, many other mutant genes that cause renal agenesis exert their effects via the GDNF/RET pathway. Therefore, RET signaling is believed to play a central role in renal organogenesis. Here, we re-examine the extent to which the functions of Gdnf and Ret are unique, by seeking conditions in which a kidney can develop in their absence. We find that in the absence of the negative regulator Spry1, Gdnf, and Ret are no longer required for extensive kidney development. Gdnf−/−;Spry1−/− or Ret−/−;Spry1−/− double mutants develop large kidneys with normal ureters, highly branched collecting ducts, extensive nephrogenesis, and normal histoarchitecture. However, despite extensive branching, the UB displays alterations in branch spacing, angle, and frequency. UB branching in the absence of Gdnf and Spry1 requires Fgf10 (which normally plays a minor role), as removal of even one copy of Fgf10 in Gdnf−/−;Spry1−/− mutants causes a complete failure of ureter and kidney development. In contrast to Gdnf or Ret mutations, renal agenesis caused by concomitant lack of the transcription factors ETV4 and ETV5 is not rescued by removing Spry1, consistent with their role downstream of both RET and FGFRs. This shows that, for many aspects of renal development, the balance between positive signaling by RTKs and negative regulation of this signaling by SPRY1 is more critical than the specific role of GDNF. Other signals, including FGF10, can perform many of the functions of GDNF, when SPRY1 is absent. But GDNF/RET signaling has an apparently unique function in determining normal branching pattern. In contrast to GDNF or FGF10, Etv4 and Etv5 represent a critical node in the RTK signaling network that cannot by bypassed by reducing the negative regulation of upstream signals.
Published Version: doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000809
Other Sources: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2797609/pdf/
Terms of Use: This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of-use#LAA
Citable link to this page: http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:8191175

Show full Dublin Core record

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

 
 

Search DASH


Advanced Search
 
 

Submitters