Comparison of Molecular Phenotypes of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ and Invasive Breast Cancer

DSpace/Manakin Repository

Comparison of Molecular Phenotypes of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ and Invasive Breast Cancer

Citable link to this page

. . . . . .

Title: Comparison of Molecular Phenotypes of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ and Invasive Breast Cancer
Author: Marotti, Jonathan; Galan, Mark; Galaburda, Laurie; Fu, Yineng; Deitz, Anne C; Tamimi, Rulla May; Baer, Heather Joanne; Connolly, James Leo; Schnitt, Stuart Jay; Colditz, Graham A.; Collins, Laura Christine

Note: Order does not necessarily reflect citation order of authors.

Citation: Tamimi, Rulla M, Heather J Baer, Jonathan Marotti, Mark Galan, Laurie Galaburda, Yineng Fu, Anne C Deitz, James L Connolly, Stuart J Schnitt, Graham A Colditz, and Laura C Collins. 2008. Comparison of molecular phenotypes of ductal carcinoma in situ and invasive breast cancer. Breast Cancer Research: BCR 10(4): R67.
Full Text & Related Files:
Abstract: Introduction: At least four major categories of invasive breast cancer that are associated with different clinical outcomes have been identified by gene expression profiling: luminal A, luminal B, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) and basal-like. However, the prevalence of these phenotypes among cases of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) has not been previously evaluated in detail. The purpose of this study was to compare the prevalence of these distinct molecular subtypes among cases of DCIS and invasive breast cancer. Methods: We constructed tissue microarrays (TMAs) from breast cancers that developed in 2897 women enrolled in the Nurses' Health Study (1976 to 1996). TMA slides were immunostained for oestrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), HER2, cytokeratin 5/6 (CK5/6) and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). Using these immunostain results, cases were grouped into molecularly defined subtypes. Results: The prevalence of the distinct molecular phenotypes differed significantly between DCIS (n = 272) and invasive breast cancers (n = 2249). The luminal A phenotype was significantly more frequent among invasive cancers (73.4%) than among DCIS lesions (62.5%) (p = 0.0002). In contrast, luminal B and HER2 molecular phenotypes were both more frequent among DCIS (13.2% and 13.6%, respectively) as compared with invasive tumours (5.2% and 5.7%, respectively) (p < 0.0001). The basal-like phenotype was more frequent among the invasive cancers (10.9%) than DCIS (7.7%), although this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.15). High-grade DCIS and invasive tumours were more likely to be HER2 type and basal-like than low- or intermediate-grade lesions. Among invasive tumours, basal-like and HER2 type tumours were more likely to be more than 2 cm in size, high-grade and have nodal involvement compared with luminal A tumours. Conclusion: The major molecular phenotypes previously identified among invasive breast cancers were also identified among cases of DCIS. However, the prevalence of the luminal A, luminal B and HER2 phenotypes differed significantly between DCIS and invasive breast cancers.
Published Version: doi://10.1186/bcr2128
Other Sources: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2575540/pdf/
Terms of Use: This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of-use#LAA
Citable link to this page: http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:8377406

Show full Dublin Core record

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

 
 

Search DASH


Advanced Search
 
 

Submitters