Daptomycin Versus Vancomycin Plus Gentamicin for Treatment of Bacteraemia and Endocarditis Due to Staphylococcus aureus: Subset Analysis of Patients Infected with Methicillin-resistant Isolates

DSpace/Manakin Repository

Daptomycin Versus Vancomycin Plus Gentamicin for Treatment of Bacteraemia and Endocarditis Due to Staphylococcus aureus: Subset Analysis of Patients Infected with Methicillin-resistant Isolates

Citable link to this page

. . . . . .

Title: Daptomycin Versus Vancomycin Plus Gentamicin for Treatment of Bacteraemia and Endocarditis Due to Staphylococcus aureus: Subset Analysis of Patients Infected with Methicillin-resistant Isolates
Author: Rehm, Susan J.; Boucher, Helen; Levine, Donald; Campion, Marilyn; Vigliani, Gloria A.; Corey, G.Ralph; Abrutyn, Elias; Eisenstein, Barry

Note: Order does not necessarily reflect citation order of authors.

Citation: Rehm, Susan J., Helen Boucher, Donald Levine, Marilyn Campion, Barry I. Eisenstein, Gloria A. Vigliani, G.Ralph Corey, and Elias Abrutyn. 2008. Daptomycin versus vancomycin plus gentamicin for treatment of bacteraemia and endocarditis due to Staphylococcus aureus: subset analysis of patients infected with methicillin-resistant isolates. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 62(6): 1413-1421.
Full Text & Related Files:
Abstract: Objectives: In a prospective, randomized trial, daptomycin was non-inferior to standard therapy for Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia and right-sided endocarditis. Since rates of infection due to methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) infection are increasing and treatment outcomes for bacteraemia caused by MRSA are generally worse than those observed with methicillin-susceptible S. aureus bacteraemia, clinical characteristics and treatment results in the trial’s pre-specified subset of patients with MRSA were analysed. Methods: Clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients receiving daptomycin were compared with those receiving vancomycin plus low-dose gentamicin. Success was defined as clinical improvement with clearance of bacteraemia among patients who completed adequate therapy, received no potentially effective non-study antibiotics and had negative blood cultures 6 weeks after end of therapy. Results: Twenty of the 45 (44.4%) daptomycin patients and 14 of the 43 (32.6%) vancomycin/gentamicin patients were successfully treated (difference 11.9%; confidence interval −8.3 to 32.1). Success rates for daptomycin versus vancomycin/gentamicin were 45% versus 27% in complicated bacteraemia, 60% versus 45% in uncomplicated bacteraemia and 50% versus 50% in right-sided MRSA endocarditis. Cure rates in patients with septic emboli and in patients who received pre-enrolment vancomycin were similar between treatment groups. However, in both treatment groups, success rates were lower in the elderly (≥75 years). Persisting or relapsing bacteraemia occurred in 27% of daptomycin and 21% of vancomycin/gentamicin patients; among these patients, MICs of ≥2 mg/L occurred in five daptomycin and four vancomycin/gentamicin patients. The clinical course of several patients may have been influenced by lack of surgical intervention. Conclusions: Daptomycin was an effective alternative to vancomycin/gentamicin for MRSA bacteraemia or right-sided endocarditis.
Published Version: doi:10.1093/jac/dkn372
Other Sources: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2583068/pdf/
Terms of Use: This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of-use#LAA
Citable link to this page: http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:8438178

Show full Dublin Core record

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

 
 

Search DASH


Advanced Search
 
 

Submitters