Why We Eat What We Eat: Explanations for Human Food Preferences and Implications for Government Regulation

DSpace/Manakin Repository

. . . . . .

Title:	Why We Eat What We Eat: Explanations for Human Food Preferences and Implications for Government Regulation
Author:	Torpoco, Edward A.
Citation:	Why We Eat What We Eat: Explanations for Human Food Preferences and Implications for Government Regulation (1997 Third Year Paper)
Full Text & Related Files:	etorpoco.pdf (232.9Kb; PDF) etorpoco.rtf (142.7Kb; RTF file) etorpoco.html (98.69Kb; HTML)
Abstract:	As this paper will demonstrate, however, understanding the reasons behind human food preferences can make a tremendous difference in the well-being of the world's people. To this end, Part II examines two competing theories for the origins of human food preferences: cultural idealism and cultural materialism. The first approach starts from the premise that human food preferences are fundamentally arbitrary--i.e., that food preferences are the results of irrational cultural prejudices--whereas the second theory posits that human food habits are rational adaptations to material conditions. Part III illustrates these two theory's explanations for two well-known food taboos: the American taboo on dog meat and the Indian taboo on cow slaughter.
Terms of Use:	This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of-use#LAA
Citable link to this page:	http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:8846767