Regulating Cochlear Implants: The Legal Response to a Scientific and Cultural Revolution

DSpace/Manakin Repository

Regulating Cochlear Implants: The Legal Response to a Scientific and Cultural Revolution

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisor Hutt, Peter Barton en_US
dc.contributor.author Mystal, Elie en_US
dc.date.accessioned 2012-06-07T04:52:52Z
dc.date.issued 2003 en_US
dc.identifier.citation Regulating Cochlear Implants: The Legal Response to a Scientific and Cultural Revolution (2003 Third Year Paper) en
dc.identifier.uri http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:8846798
dc.description.abstract This paper is a case study on the cochlear implant device. The inquiry will explore the important aspects of the device's intended use, its legal regulation, and its moral impact. Through this case study I hope to illustrate how this particular technology distinguishes itself from other medical devices that the Food and Drug Administration regulates. I also examine how well the FDA answers the unique scientific and ethical questions that the device poses. This paper looks at the legal response to cochlear implants through the lense of the implant's societal impact. The research for this paper proceeded in four parts. The first part consisted of reading industry articles, reviews, and manifests in order to understand the hard science of the device. The next part was to understand the regulatory scheme. For that I consulted my Food and Drug law casebook, law review articles that dealt with medical device regulation, and noted cases on the matter. I then tried to ascertain the legal issues that were most pressing to the people who worked directly with the technology. I did this mainly through interviews of clinicians, manufactures, educators, and patients. Finally I consulted books and articles written by or about the leading detractors of the technology, focusing those who oppose it on moral and ethical grounds. This then required me to look towards common law (particularly the field of Family Law) to determine if these detractors had cognizable legal claims. en
dc.language.iso en_US en
dash.license LAA en_US
dc.subject Food and Drug Law en
dc.subject hearing en
dc.subject hearing health en
dc.subject technology en
dc.subject ethics en
dc.title Regulating Cochlear Implants: The Legal Response to a Scientific and Cultural Revolution en
dc.type Paper (for course/seminar/workshop) en_US
dc.date.available 2012-06-07T04:52:52Z

Files in this item

Files Size Format View
Mystal.pdf 182.1Kb PDF View/Open
Mystal.rtf 101.9Kb RTF file View/Open
Mystal.html 104.9Kb HTML View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

 
 

Search DASH


Advanced Search
 
 

Submitters