| Title: | The Right to Stay Alive? |
| Author: | Blot, Madeleine |
| Citation: | The Right to Stay Alive? (1998 Third Year Paper) |
| Full Text & Related Files: |
mblot.pdf (337.1Kb; PDF)
mblot.rtf (278.2Kb; RTF file)
mblot.html (244.6Kb; HTML)
|
| Abstract: | While standing by my belief that FDA "can't help" infringing on the right of terminally-ill individuals, I will argue that the matter should be removed from FDA's jurisdiction altogether, and evaluated in a constitutional setting where it more properly belongs. Before I move on to a discussion of why I believe that the question of whether the terminally-ill should have access to unapproved but potentially life-saving drugs should be dealt with as a constitutional matter, I will briefly discuss why I believe that it should not be dealt with by the FDA. |
| Terms of Use: | This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of-use#LAA |
| Citable link to this page: | http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:8846801 |
Contact administrator regarding this item (to report mistakes or request changes)