Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorHutt, Peter Bartonen_US
dc.contributor.authorBlot, Madeleineen_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-06-07T04:57:36Z
dc.date.issued1998en_US
dc.identifier.citationThe Right to Stay Alive? (1998 Third Year Paper)en
dc.identifier.urihttp://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:8846801
dc.description.abstractWhile standing by my belief that FDA "can't help" infringing on the right of terminally-ill individuals, I will argue that the matter should be removed from FDA's jurisdiction altogether, and evaluated in a constitutional setting where it more properly belongs. Before I move on to a discussion of why I believe that the question of whether the terminally-ill should have access to unapproved but potentially life-saving drugs should be dealt with as a constitutional matter, I will briefly discuss why I believe that it should not be dealt with by the FDA.en
dc.language.isoen_USen
dash.licenseLAAen_US
dc.subjectFood and Drug Lawen
dc.subjectphilosophy of regulationen
dc.subjectterminal illnessen
dc.subjectunapproved drugsen
dc.titleThe Right to Stay Alive?en
dc.typePaper (for course/seminar/workshop)en_US
dc.date.available2012-06-07T04:57:36Z
dash.authorsorderedfalse


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record