Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorHutt, Peter Bartonen_US
dc.contributor.authorSamuel, Anand A.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-07-06T21:31:50Z
dc.date.issued2005en_US
dc.identifier.citationFDA Regulation of Condoms: Minimal Scientific Uncertainty Fuels the Moral Conservative Plea to Rip a Large Hole in the Public's Perception of Contraception (2005 Third Year Paper)en
dc.identifier.urihttp://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:8965574
dc.description.abstractThis paper surveys the history of condom use, the underlying science, the FDA regulation of condoms and the recent debate on condoms and their effectiveness in preventing disease. In articulating the debate, perspectives of the Catholic Church are propounded as examples of arguments hinging exclusively on religious moral premises. The Church's perspectives are revealing in the way that they shape so called medical or scientific recommendations against condom use. Accordingly, this paper explores the conclusions of social conservatives that, assuming condoms should be prohibited; the key alternative is abstinence and chastity.en
dc.language.isoen_USen
dash.licenseLAAen_US
dc.subjectFood and Drug Lawen
dc.subjectcondomsen
dc.subjectcontraceptionen
dc.titleFDA Regulation of Condoms: Minimal Scientific Uncertainty Fuels the Moral Conservative Plea to Rip a Large Hole in the Public's Perception of Contraceptionen
dc.typePaper (for course/seminar/workshop)en_US
dc.date.available2012-07-06T21:31:50Z
dash.authorsorderedfalse


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record