Regulations on Biotechnological Research and Biologically Modified Products

DSpace/Manakin Repository

Regulations on Biotechnological Research and Biologically Modified Products

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisor Hutt, Peter Barton en_US
dc.contributor.author Chuan-Feng, Wu en_US
dc.date.accessioned 2012-08-23T11:12:04Z
dc.date.issued 2002 en_US
dc.identifier.citation Regulations on Biotechnological Research and Biologically Modified Products (2002 Third Year Paper) en
dc.identifier.uri http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:9453692
dc.description.abstract The developments in biotechnology have brought not only benefits but also harms to society. On the one hand, the biotechnologically modified products has rapidly changed our lifestyle, but on the other hand, they could also endanger the ecosystem due to their reproduction and novel characteristics, and raise sharp debate over social values, including moral and religious values, and ethical standards. These rapid developments and problems of biotechnology posed a significant challenge to policymakers. E.g., are current regulations enough? Or do we need more regulations for biotechnological experiments and the development of genetically modified products because of their potential negative impacts? After comparing the advantages (such as the avoidance of the negative and special influences of biotechnology, and the solution of market failure and social injustice) and disadvantages (such as economic loss, government failure, and violation of social justice and freedom of scientific experiments), this research addressed that more and specified regulations are necessary. However, the scope of regulations ¡V or how much control the government should have in scientific development ¡V should be reasonably limited to give consideration to the independence of scientific fields, and economic developments. First, the regulations of biotechnological experiments should be looser than those of genetically modified products because of the different substantial impacts on consumers, and the respect of the freedom of speech (or research). Second, more participation of the general public will help to avoid the professionals¡¦ and governments¡¦ arbitrary decisions. Third, the regulations of ¡§Physical Risks¡¨ and ¡§Social Risks and Ethical Considerations¡¨ should be different because their influences are varified. en
dc.language.iso en_US en
dash.license LAA en_US
dc.subject Food and Drug Law en
dc.subject Biotechnology en
dc.subject Biotechnological Research en
dc.subject Biotechnologically (genetically) Modified Product en
dc.subject Regulation en
dc.title Regulations on Biotechnological Research and Biologically Modified Products en
dc.type Paper (for course/seminar/workshop) en_US
dc.date.available 2012-08-23T11:12:04Z

Files in this item

Files Size Format View
wu.pdf 221.2Kb PDF View/Open
wu.rtf 337.5Kb RTF file View/Open
wu.html 153.9Kb HTML View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

 
 

Search DASH


Advanced Search
 
 

Submitters