The Rise and Fall of Sysopdom

DSpace/Manakin Repository

The Rise and Fall of Sysopdom

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Zittrain, Jonathan L.
dc.date.accessioned 2012-10-05T19:24:46Z
dc.date.issued 1997
dc.identifier.citation Jonathan Zittrain, 10 Harv. J.L. & Tech. 495 (1997). en_US
dc.identifier.issn 0897-3393 en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:9696318
dc.description.abstract "Sysop" has gone from a term of art known only to the bleeding-edge few to a dusty anachronism known only to the bleeding-gums few, without the usual years-long general linguistic acceptance and respect in between. In case the reader is not among the bleeders: sysops (from "system operators") run electronic areas accessible by typing furiously on one’s networked computer, through which one can meet, talk to (well, at least type at), and develop nuanced social relationships with other people similarly typing and reading. Few know what a sysop is because these electronic areas — aspirationally, and sometimes accurately, known as "online communities" — have never quite flourished and today are in decline. Indeed, "online community" joins "sysop" in the oversize dustbin of trite or hopelessly esoteric, hence generally meaningless, cyberspace vernacular. Not that "online community" is obscure, like "sysop"; rather, the term’s emptiness results from its abuse. "Online community" is used by Internet companies the way a motivational speaker uses "excellence," an academic uses "new paradigm," or a lawyer uses "justice": it represents something once craved and still invoked (if only as a linguistic placeholder) even as it is believed by all but the most naïve to be laughably beyond reach. Since it’s applied to almost anything, it now means vague warm fuzzies and nothing more. The craft of sysoping and the phenomenon of online community (non-hollowly defined) have gone down together even as the Internet has burgeoned, and I want to explain what has happened to sysops as a way of explaining what has happened to the truly great and transformative promise of online communities. Law has played a major role in two distinct ways. First, sysops and the members of the communities they lead have struggled through lawlike reflection to arrive at just solutions to the disputes that inevitably arise in the course of their interactions. This struggle is a large part of what has made the communities so interesting. Second, fear of the formalistic application of the machinery of the real-world legal system is threatening to drive the amateur sysop to extinction and thereby to destroy what’s left of online community. en_US
dc.language.iso en_US en_US
dc.publisher Harvard Law School en_US
dc.relation.isversionof http://www.jolt.law.harvard.edu/article/pdf/v10/10HarvJLTech495.pdf en_US
dc.relation.hasversion http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/publications/1997/Rise_and_Fall_of_Sysopdom en_US
dash.license OAP
dc.title The Rise and Fall of Sysopdom en_US
dc.type Journal Article en_US
dc.relation.journal Harvard Journal of Law & Technology en_US
dash.depositing.author Zittrain, Jonathan L.
dc.date.available 2012-10-05T19:24:46Z

Files in this item

Files Size Format View xmlui.dri2xhtml.METS-1.0.item-files-description
Zittrain_RiseandFallofSysopdom.pdf 183.2Kb PDF View/Open Zittrain_RiseFallSysopdom

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

 
 

Search DASH


Advanced Search
 
 

Submitters