I think there are important things that can be learnt through genetic engineering to provide cures for disease however I have some slight concern about what else this could be used for
I agree partly with Genetic engineering but when it involves human life I think it is wrong i.e embryos being changed in some form
I don't understand what this term means so just put neutral
I do not know enough about it to have an informed opinion.
If its for the good, medical terms and cures of course i agree
I know tis may be necessary but it makes me a little uncomfortable
If it can help identify and eradicat faulty genes then it would be good
I don_Ñét believe in messing with nature
I think it's important for health reasons, if it impacted on my life or someone I loved, I'd want the research to be as thorough as possibke
its the future and needs to be looked at
This has the potential to greatly improve lives, including elimination of previously incurable diseases.
there is proof of success in this field and we should be leading the way, not holding back
I feel it could help more people that have genetic problems
It's somewhat alarming but I suspect it will be done by someone somewhere, so it may as well be regulated and done officially.
It will help to advance the treatments for us.
if it helps with diseases and health then it should be advanced
We don't need it,  it tampers with natural process
It could be the cause of our own extinction
Would be good to be able to engineer genes so children are born without certain undesirable genetics such as hereditary disabilities
Needs to be done becuase of potential benefits (eg health) but needs careful regulation
There is nothing wrong or inherently bad about genetic engineering
would need to know more about the subject
It depends on what this genetic engineering would be used for, if it is for solely positive purposes not ideas such as designer babies then i agree with the statement
Could possibly help towards eradicating disease
I don't know enough about genetic engineering to give a qualified answer
don't know enough about the subject to say
Things for good and bad can be done and should be heavily regulated
It just seems fake to me and not natural
Jddj ddid dkdbdux xix dhsoef fpr aoa wus xixmdmdk ddbd dkdlx x djdxb ux dhd d dyd dhd dudjkskskss xbdhrioeornnykyt gmgk
Genetric engineering is not a good thing to do. Messing with nature can only cause more problems.
It depends on exactly what they are doing
Unknown consequences could be negative/dangerous
8 think it's dangerous and goes against nature
By engineering our food it_Ñés causing disease and is killing off the wildlife that depend on it. So what if the tangerines have seeds!  Seeds are important for future planting.  All this mess8ng with nature must be banned
Its a contreversial topic. We don't know whether there are any negative aspects or long term harm. For example, allegies with GM crops
Messages no with things we shouldn_Ñét be
It might help medical advancement but not for recreating life etc...it sounds freaky
We could eradicate diseases if we allowed scientists to unlock our genetic code, we are too afraid of upsetting someone and its stupid
It_Ñés progressive and good for the future
there are many scientific development and health developments which could be made with increased use of genetic engineering
I think we need to spend more on this to advance and help with finding cures for illnesses but i think there are other priorities to spend money on
I dont havd much of an opinion on generic engineering
It can be beneficial but may also cause problems
Genetic engineering has benefits to society.  However, it needs to be regulated with proper ethical framework/oversight
Don't believe in fiddling with God's creation
I think we should let nature take its course as this escalation of genetic engineering is damaging our world and views on perfection
I need to find out more about it before making a decision either way.
It's a dangerous thing because of the risk of designer babies and experimentation
I don_Ñét know much about it so can_Ñét comment
I believe it would aid medical health greatly.
It should be advanced because it can help many people across the world to live much better lives.
Not really sure what her Its going to be a good or bad thing
It's a question of how far is to far for me
not a believer in genetic engineering prefer more natural sources
It can be good for the right reasons - i.e medical research
If we can irradiate disease and cancers through genetic engineering it should be done, but not for purely cosmetic reasons
To stop children bring born with dreadful conditions
I need to know more to make an informed decision
Maybe it shouldnt go any further and stay where it is
It is important to press ahead with science
I think being able to help out with prenatal problems would be ideal
This endeavour will cure many diseases in the next 20 years.
Some areas of this we should leave well alone whilst other areas to prevent disease should be advanced
It will enable treatment for illnesses to.be advanced
It's playing god and people would abuse it
Something are Good but something not like
I am in 2 minds on this one. It can be for the good but also for the bad. Technology is a wonderful thing but I believe we could go too far
Genetic engineering makes me feel uncomfortable
Genetic engineering is dry important to help the world move forward
Advancing science for health benefits would be a plus in my eyes.
If engineering is advanced and make new technologies then uk on the top
I don't really know all that much about it.
i think if it is being used for medical research it should be advanced
So that some of the disease could be solved using that
I think that "Generic Engineering" is a scientific field that can lead to many different applications, and that's why I can't decide once and for all on whether, as a whole, it should be advanced or not. For instance, I support medical research that would lead to the victory against several diseases, like Leukemia or Parkinson's. However, I don't feel completely comfortable with the idea of generically modified food, for example.
I chose to agree with the statement because I believe many good things will come from genetic engineering and it should have all the backing it needs.
In order to make improvements, science needs to keep on moving, however this is sometimes a little unnerving
its very debatable. i dont know enough about the subject to comment
Not sure because adequate legislation would need to be made.
More research needs to be done. I am rather wary of the companies involved in GE/GM.
It might help in creating advanced world
I believe it should only be used for the good. To help save the live of a relative etc...
Genetic engineering has some benefits that should be persued but it also has the potential for abuse and scarey outcomes
I just agree with it it should be advanced
The benefits of learning more about genetics to improve healthcare are very exciting and important for helping others.
GE can help eradicate diseases, infections and overall medicine. Also, with the use of GMOs, food is much better
Food will eventually run out if we do not work on something new
If its comestic reason no but for removing illnesss yes maybe
More lifes could be saved through use of genetic engineering
I think it should be used but very carefully
Engineering is a core of development and it an important aspect for properity
genetic engineering could help cure or eradicate some diseases
it is not a topic that i have thought about
We all have a lifespan, this is being changed because of genetic engineering and only the rich will benefit
Not really sure about it yet. More research needed.
Genetic engineering can be used for positive benefits for humankind. In the field of medicine it can be used to prevent some of the most terrible conditions. I feel this has to be of benefit. It could also possibly be used to eradicate some of the most common causes of ill health.
it would progress the treatment of certain diseases
FEEL UNSURE TO WHAT EXTENT THEY WOULD TAKE THIS
Could probably help with the world food shortage
advances in growing body parts for people are necessary but don't agree with choosing sex of baby
Anything to do with science is worth agreeing to in my view. Genetic engineering might one day be in the forefront of scientific development
Because it could help find cures for illnesses that don't have one yet.
I don_Ñét know enough about it to have an opinion
I don,t much about it, i will be clear on where i stand if i get a better understanding of it
This will help with world food shortages especially in areas that are affected by famine and drought.
it should be more developed than it is now
Again I don't know enough about this subject to be 'for' or 'against' it
Within reason it could be a benifit to humans
Agree as technology is growing very fast and expanding
Some good thing – medical Some bad things - designer babies
i dont really know as i dont knowalot aout this subject
I think some things should be left well alone as we are altering things which may cause problems in the future.
Because I am pro-science in all its forms
I dont know what genetic engineering is to make a proper comment
I think it_Ñés good as we can learn more and help more in the world with genetic engineering
If it is to be used for good then yes I.e. cure diseases but this could lead to people having to be rich to afford treatment which could mean the poor miss out. It could also lead to conflicts between more developed countries and the rest of the world.
We should not play around with nature too much more
We should stop playing god. Genetic engineering may sound like a wonderful idea, but its also really dangerous.
The way forward. We have always used it to a greater or lesser degree and should continue to do so.
Genetic engineering can be used to enhance food supply and help developing nations. It is not a risk for humans as genetic engineering of human foetuses is banned. However there is a risk of genetically engineered species affecting evolution in unpredictable ways if fertile
Somethings you shouldn't meddle with but on the other hand, how do you progress without change.
Human beings should not get involved in messing up what nature has perfected for 100000000s of years.
I can see lots of positives and I should have agreed but I don't know if we are capable of putting appropriate safe guards in place world wide.
it has the power to feed the world with genetic modified food
Its all in advancement to a better understanding of things, in all things.
I am a bit unsure with regards to genetic engineering as it isn_Ñét natural and could lead to choosing sex, which is going too far. But on the other hand I_Ñém sure it is vital in a lot of medical instances, so I found it hard to say one way or the other.
I'm not sure what is meant by 'genetic engineering'
It could help reduce birth defects and improve a child_Ñés quality of life, however it should only be used for that purpose
I just think we should be more advanced than other countries
I don't know enough about the topic to give a reasoned opinion.
Where to you draw the line at determining choosing to create your own baby
So that we can try to eradicate some serious illnesses
reduce cancer and other diseases free etc.
I see no problems with it was going to say strongly but there should be controls
Feels like it's a way of advancing a few different fields and is more positive for the future than negative
I have heard that genetic engineering can cause problems like frankenstien foods.
I don't know enough about the pros and cons to have a firm view either way.
Only because so far with genetic engineering it has proved helpful in understanding diseases and finding cures for diseases
It can be a positive thing when thinking of eradicating genetic illnesses like Huntingdon's disease, but I don't agree that it should be advanced for creating 'designer' babies.
its not something i consider myself to have a strong opinion on
Genetic engineering is wrong unless it's to eradicate illnesses
Need more information as not that knowledgeable about the subject
we could potentially cure diseases with this kind of research
It's good to advance sometimes but it's good to be weary of what your advancing
like to alter faulty genes and such like
I agree with everything being advanced. Better tech
it can cause all sorts of problems as wel as solve some
Nature should be assisted to eradicate diseases
Really can't decide on the ethical and moral issues here, there are pros and cons.
As the genetic materials are getting more familiar and so it is required to be advance and sophisticated
It has given new life to numerous people particularly military personnel
It_Ñés a positive thing to have due to the advances in illnesses and diseases which can be eradicated.
No no and no. This could lead to a huge disaster, experiments getting done behind closed doors etc
anything that can be done to improve treatments and quality of life should be pursued
To help understand and prevent terminal illness.
People are always looking at innovations
its fine if it going to save lives but when its done just to make your life easy and perfect then no
I think genetics are going to far and they are not natural
i do not know enough about it to make any real judgement
It's quite a controversial topic that essentially defies nature if we advance too far.
Although I am sure it might help eradicate some diseases and illnesses, I am concerned about selective parenthood - in other words, people being able to create a certain look of child for, possibly, vanity.
It would depend on the targeted outcome; positive, for health reasons, or sinister for "master-race" type reasons.
The world is moving on, I'd like to think in 50 years time huge scientific leaps will be made
Don't know much about it, but it seems less of a priority than some other things
Good for research and disease control. Not good for designer babies
I have no opinion really as I do not understand it
We should understand how a genom works and use it to cure diseases
I don_Ñét know enough intricate details to decide on the impact I can see big negatives and positives but feel that I would need to know more before deciding.
With medical advancements always changing for the good, it should be allowed to progress to keep up with the rest of the world.
Although it has it'e drawbacks it must be better for mankind in the long run.
There are both good and bad things possibilities regarding genetic engineering.
it troubles me while it could be used for good it could also be used to harm
DONT KNOW ANYTHING ABOUT GENETIC ENGINEERING
it would help with people with genetic diseases
With the technology we have nowadays, we should have more advanced engineering.
It_Ñés better to have more training than not enough
Very generic term which I find too wide to agree or disagree
i don_Ñét know how it will help but it could be good
Concerns around interference with nature thus upsetting the balance of population
There are some uses but needs to be carefully controlked and managed which is very difficult.
Shouldn't be choosing genetics it will lead to selected babies like how hitle preferred the Arian race
This technology has the potential to eliminate genetic conditions which cause suffering shorten human lives.
I'm on the fence.  I slightly believe in the let things take their course naturally and don't interfere.  However, I can also see many health benefits for people coming through in the future.  It could also help with food issues but also do we need it?
I personally feel that I don't know enough about it to give a proper judgement
It sets us on a path that I am not comfortable with.
Engineering should be more advanced because it's a complicated job
I do not have enough knowledge to say either way but do accept that science should keep advancing.Genetic engineering does have ethical questions about the extent of it's use.
Nature has proven itself to be the best designer over the cause of millennia. Human intervention is to be avoided.
I don_Ñét know much about this subject so went for the neutral response.
This is not the right way forward . Medicine and operations are one thing but interfering with a God given blue print on individual lives is another and should not be done.
if we are going to do it we need to know everything about it and have full control and remain ethical
dont like the idea of still a lot unknown about outcome
I don_Ñét know enough about it to comment really.
we can rid some horrible medical conditions. but their is dangers
Genetic engineering could help with curing the sick and helping modify foods to help feed the world
I think for life saving good, designer babies is wrong
I don't know enough about it to comment.
I can see some benefits of it but also as many negatives, to rid disease or ailments is not a bad thing but would it create a super race?
we should have a better understanding before we do certain research projects
genetic engineering should be advanced to find new cures for diseases and to help with the disabled only. not try and create super humans or longevity.
An amazing opportunity to rid the world of some horrible conditions such as MS etc, BUT must be strictly regulated.
There are a lot of other issues to deal with first
Science cannot take over the  world. We are trying to force nature to cave in and let mad people do mad expensive experiments. God made this world and its God who rules over everything not mankind. Religion not science
I feel that I don_Ñét know enough about Genetic Engineering to comment either way
i think it would help the country move forward
Not sure on that for some bad illnesses it could help but to tamper too much can cause more problems
Generally I think it would benefit society. The possibilities are endless.
Can help with combating serious illnesses
I think it's important for the sustainability of our future.
I think nature should be left to take it's course with out so much inteference
I don't have any opinion on genetic engineering therefore cannot make comment.
I don't know enough about it to form a solid opinion
Benefits outweigh religious, but not moral considerations.
Don_Ñét know. Enough about this to comment
Assume this refers to creating types of babies and I disagree with this
certain thing in life are not to be altered
It can advance certain areas of life eg prolonging people's lives, avoiding pain/suffering, deformatives etc but it needs to be used with great caution and strict controls as all advancement is not necessarily good advancement...where does it end?
I do not understand the considerations and consequences sufficiently to make an informed choice
I_Ñém down the middle on this because I can see the benefits of eradicating disease etc but worried about the dark side of what could happen.
don't know a lot about this so cannot give to much information
I am not sure whether it is ethical in some cases. However if it is to be used to eradicate certain diseases then ok. But it must be regulated
every form of engineering should be advanced
We need to be ahead of the game. A leading force. We need to find new ways and this one way.
Again, there are pros and cons - it delends on context.
I believe that genetic engineering animals is not humane and shouldn_Ñét be done. However I think that genetically engineered fruit and vegetables aren_Ñét harmful and can help society prosper.
It's a good idea in theory but there are sometimes complications which cannot be foreseen with genetic engineering
It has great potential to benefit mankind by preventing diseases & disabilities as well as in farming to make greater rates of food production possible with disease resistant crops but should be advanced with great care in all areas
I think it can advance our food and animals. Leading to more crop production among with other things
Would likely provide direction to solutions to age old health problems
Don't know enough already about genetic engineering to say it shouldn't or should be advanced.
It could provide us with murder-free meat.
I don not know enough about this topic to give an answer
The possibility to eliminate genetic diseases and to prevent or stop degenerative illnesses needs to be developed.
While it can be beneficial, there is a chance it could be taken too far
It is good for things like medical advances but I believe you should not mess around with natures way
they have a way with word you have a spsific point of view
we shouldn't mess with nature on such things
While it can be worth while, such as with stem cells, however, should people be playing god?'
Feels like something we should definitely make advancements in
it depends what is implied by genetic engineering. i have no issue with food production, manipulition of the genome is more dubious though
The potential health benefits that are possible cannot be ignored. However, the statement is quite broad. There needs to be a code of practice/morals/ethics applied to ensure that this is appropriately used and is not misused.
There should be highest levels of treatment available
I AM NOT FAMILIAR WITH THIS TOPIC SO CANT SAY EITHER WAY
I really don't know about genetic engineering
Science has unpicked the human genome and it should be given the biggest budget to find ways around human illness.
I'm not a fan or dont have any clue about it
I dont know enough about it to say yes or no
In its too early stages to be able to judge.
In theory genetic engineering could be used for the betterment of mankind and the enviroment etc. But there are too many ways for it to be corrupted.
Im unsure about the statistics, and details of it.
It could cure diseases and help scientific breakthroughs
If it used for good it has amazing potential
I think this is an area that should be advanced
Science needs to advance to cope with medical problems
It is very important and needs advancements
I think it has gone far enough people live longer and the elderly are being let down so why would you want to live longer. Getting rid of diseases is all well and good but what next
because if we continue to advance with genetic engineering we can in the future increase resistance to many diseases in both plants and animals
It is wrong and goes against human nature
Do not like the idea of messing with nature
Genetic engineering could prevent all different kinds of illnesses and could cure existing ones
Progress in technology is what makes the world turn
If it can be used to improve health by removing life-limiting conditions then it is a good thing
Really depends on what they are engineering and if it could harm nature if released into the wild
This will be the source of future industrial growth
I don_Ñét know enough about it. Depends how it is used.
I believe it will be useful in the treatment of disease
This is very vague about the context but in general there is nothing wrong with advancing knowledge and maybe finding ways to improve people lives who may be suffering from health problems
I think that anything that can look to improve things then it_Ñés a good idea and will keep the country moving forward
I have had Breast cancer due to a genetic fault, anything which could prevent future generations from suffering is a great idea!
I think we shoul be able to clone more things
I am not sure if genetic engineering does not cause as many problems in the long run as it solves in the short run.
I was thinking straightaway of horror stories, Jurassic park, cloning humans
We should not interfere with natural produce
Don't know much about genetic engineering
I think the science is good but it can be abused to do absurd things.
not sure if enogh is done to monitor this whilst it is being performed
I'm not fully sure on the meaning of this statement but if it's to do with robotics I'm old fashioned and can't see the purpose of this
further our science in this field to unlock new possibilitys
Even though i do see the benefits such as tackling heath issues, i believe that we human will misuse this technology to further our extreme ambitions. For example military strength
genetic engineering is the next step of the progress
Hard to say when no particular aim is given. In general I'm in favour of genetic development as long as it doesn't border on the bizarre.
Most of the time any kind of advancement is good all round and engineering is important in todays day and age.
shouldn't mess too much much with nature
Worried about the ultimate result of genetic engineering
It depends on what sort of genetic engineering is meant. Plants have been subject to this for a longish time, if your consider selective breeding of strains. If this is in connection with animals or humans, then I am not happy about selective breeding
I don_Ñét know enough about it yet to have an opinion
It depends exactly what the subject of the genetic engineering is. This question is not specific enough for a definitive answer
Don't know enough on subject to make informedopinion
If it helps prevent genetic diseases in offspring then it should be
I do not know much about this subject therefore i feel i cannot comment.
I think maybe there should be more space for it to maybe be advanced but there is more important things that should come first
I'm just not sure it's ethical, however it would make life easier
I think genetics should be left to engineer themselves
because it could help with the increase of diseases and help with the reduction in natural resoruces
I don_Ñét really have an opinion on it to me it doesn_Ñét mean anything
Because cancer brain illnesses will be wiped out
We are going to run out of so many thing in the not to distant future and we need them to still be there
I feel I do not know enough to comment or agree/disagree
i wouldnt see a difference made to my life or most lives around me if there was a change, it is also a very expensive field to engage in, who would pay for it?
Advances on science have advantages for medicine and the environment
Depends on the type, good to cure diseases but not for selective breeding.
Do not know enough to say strongly either way
The speed of development in areas such as Genetic engineering moves too fast for our legislators to keep up. Despite this there must continue to be close control
If done carefully and with compassion could cure many illnesses
Not sure of implications eg designer babies- appalling idea and modified plants also problematic re making pests extinct whilst feeding more people. I think ethics of gene modification should play vital role.
Help prevent/cure diseases in future by developing genetic solutions
To be fair, I don't understand it. So I cant agree or disagree with something I know nothing about
As I'm not sure if it's a goog thing or a bad thing as it would help in development but would cause problems and damage in the long run
I feel there are bigger issues so don't feel strongly either way
I think it's a very useful source of revenue as well as providing many advances in science and other areas.
I don't know enough about it to make an informed opinion
It will lead to major advances in the treatment of genetic illnesses and cancers
Required but not totally on board with the idea
I am not sure that sufficient safeguards are in place at the momement
I don't know enough about genetic engineering to make comment.
I think it should be advanced but we need to pay close attention to ethical considerations.
I would have to hear more arguments on both sides to reach an informed decision
There needs to be a close watch on what happens, but the opportunity to prevent genetic illness and to cure almost all illness should not be missed. Where pain can be prevented, particularly from the young it should be.
I don't believe there is anything wrong with it
Genetic engineering could be important in stopping diseases or illnesses from passing down throigh genetics but it's also morally grey how far genetics should be altered, for example should you be able to change the appearance of your child?
Licudzbsdkicubcduikdcgsujkdzscgzdcsujgzsdcuidcsgiczsduygdvyugyxhhxjsjjjjs jjsjknk! indecisive the same the same the same time the time the your you have any questions or concerns please visit the same the same the same the same the same Day shipping to
Depends on the intended use and the potential for things going wrong
I think it will lead to a great future for mankind
It plays a strong role in medical cure developments and research.
I am not familiar with genetic engineering
i am pro life but if genetic engineering helps the world then ye
Don't know enough about it to commit either way
I think Genetic engineering could help in the field of medicine.
Science has developed rapidly in this field but needs to press on further.
If it benefits humanity it should be encouraged.
Because it could help with many problems
I am currently on the fence with regard to genetic engineering
Don't really understand it to have an opinion.
Because it is important to me and mist people
i don't know enough about it to make a judgement
Think there's a way to go to develop more
Could help with genetherapy. And has many benefits.
it can help to with issues such as infertility but it should not be advanced enough to where it can create a 'perfect' race
Messing with genes.  Genetic testing could go wrong
I believe it runs or should run in the family
Genetic engineering should be advanced because there could instancecthat could help mum to help them in getting pregnant
Surely this can only help things, though I do appreciate that some things can go too far
Science advances humankind - that's helped civilisation
It has advantages in the field of health, but I would not like to think that it wold be used to define a person's race or charactoristics
We should not be messing with nature in this way.
if its taking away humanity and individuality then i don't think it should be advanced
Many diseases/conditions can be eradicated by genetic engineering
It would lead to designer babies and the elimination of the differences and defects that make us human and interesting.
Depends what you mean by Genetic engineering. Food or material.
There is a lot of medical breakthroughs that may happen due to this
Badly written statement, meaning not clear. If you mean _ÑÉprioritised_Ñé or _ÑÉaccelerated_Ñé , despite some advantages of GE, current caustious progress is sufficient in my view.
I'm not too informed on the subject so i decided on a neutral answer
Am not really into engineering there for i can not comment
some things might benefit people suffering from certain illnesses but could be used against certain people and races
i dont know enough about the subject to have strong opinions
If this can irradiate cancers, why not, butIdo worry, if we cure one disease, will Mother Nature give asa worse one to contend with?
We need them for some foods and medical treatments. But making things Un natural like desease no .
it would depend upon the means for which it is being enhanced. Should it be for medical purposes then yes but you need to try and get back some of the NHS to be able to make use of it before the Tories sell it all
I think it would be helpful to prevent some genetic diseases
We should not be messing about with God's creation
I dont have an opinion on genetic engineering
I_Ñém pro genetic engineeering for food but I assumed this was a question about it with people and I would disagree with it because it would lead to certain groups being able to use this to advance themselves or prejudices
I don_Ñét know enough about this subject
cheaper food production find cures for diseases more quickly
Its a good thing and should be supported
It would be great to heal or prevent illness but there are dangers in attempts to create a super race
Although good for medical progress but can be misused
I think the more they do will help in the future
It is a way forward that we should investigate.
Not just for the sake of it. Only if it is for health and medical reasons
Science has proven it to be a good and safe thing. Full stop. Too much scaremongering from the youtube educated generations.
genetic engineering can be a good thing in finding cures for diseases and helping feed the world
I don't like the idea of science over-ruling nature
Genetic engineering should be advanced because it has helped scientists figure out how cells and organisms work therefore understanding the causes of diseases and finding best ways to cure them.
I think there are benefits available which will probably outweigh the risks
as the worlds population is getting greater food is becoming short and therefore genetics should look at help this problem
it is something that i am quite interested in and the whole thing works for me and hopefully the future will encourage more of these things
I just don't know enough about it to have a strong opinion
To improve the health of people and help with medical costs in the long run
Science can answer lots of questions and be the solution to problems only if we fund research to
it is unnatural, we should not tamper with nature
genetic engineering could be useful in eradicating certain diseases etc
Don't know enough about this area to make an informed decision
again dont know enough about the subject
I don't like the idea of designer babies. I think that's a slippery route, although I appreciate that for life-threatening diseases that are genetic then it's better to screen these out.
Research into this sector could aid in fighting illness
Think nature is being fooled around with too much
We are messing with things that we have barely even begun to understand
Its worrying that people could buy a child they believe they want ie blonde hair over red
I think it could be an aid to the world and help discover new technologies
Unsure about whether this would be a good thing or a bad thing
If it can help with understanding illnesses etc
They are just words made up to make something look good or important
Way forward for medicine has the potential to cure lots of illnesses
I need to know more about it to make a decision
Thought you might ask that - We still need to know more about the human make-up to advance medicine and disease management.
I do not know enough about this to comment any differently
It can save lives and health care costs.
If it helps advance the human race it should be allowed
Fervently disagree with messing with this sort fo thing
its an innovative thing so it should be advanced
Genetic engineering is helpful to society, I.e genetically modifying foods to have more nutrients so that poorer people can have access to nutrients they need to survive
Further advances in genetically engineering are unethical.
Some things are not meant to be played with
So much for the human race to learn and use for medical purposes.
The demand for food at a reasonable cost will require more efficient farming techniques and genetic engineering is one of several other options which will help.
Not 100% sure what it involved so would have to know more.
I'm not educated enough on this subject to give a proper opinion
I thought about how advancements in genetic engineering can assist with mitigating the effects of disease. However I do believe it needs to be regulated properly and monitored to ensure it_Ñés managed ethically and responsibly
If used for medical advancement then ok, but not for other reasons such as cloning
Genetics should be left alone. Playing around with nature.
genetic engineering should only be done if absolutely necessary not just for cosmetic or commercial gain
it is quite a sensitive subject what with animal rights etc
Most things nowadays come down to genetics... what was, is and will be
I think everything in life is being increased in speed and people are being persuaded to live their life fast, fast food, faster cars etc...things need to slow down somewhat and be encouraged to be mord patient wsitjng for things to grow naturally.
Within strict ethical guidelines, to improve food security. Possibly to develop some medical applications, eg gene therapy, cheap and reliable sources of products such as insulin
This is a science which can be used effectively to benefit the wider population but should not be allowed to have a significant impact individually with issues which are potentially morally questionable or dangerous
It all depends. Iradicatimg diseases is acceptable. But playing God e.g. designer babies goes against my religion and beliefs
Genetics are individual and not there to be messed with
Anything that might lead to cures for cancer and other afflictions should be pursued
I think this could be beneficial in some cases but we need to weigh the implications;
It_Ñés a grey area with benefits for health but issues with mutation of cells etc
I think it is something that is becoming more popular and helpful
I'm concerned that science, specifically genetic engineering is advancing too quickly and won't be so well regulated within the UK when we leave the EU.
I don_Ñét know enough about the subject to have such a strong opinion either way
Nature alone should be left to genetics, without humans mucking about with it.
I feel that we should not interfere with the natural course of events.
I just think it is right and should be carried on
If it can help with curing diseases it should be advanced
I'm unsure about it as I'm sure it would be very beneficial but in the wrong hands could be very dangerous. I just think that are current leaders are to corrupt and power /money driven it would be used to further their aims and not to benefit mankind
No thoughts, just that it is a promising area of science
I don't know enough about the subject to form a plausible opinion
Its a contentious subject AND this question is way too broad to answer
This is an essential part of research that can assist with life threatening circumstances to cure and rectify mistakes made by the human condition.
Always good to keep changing with the times I think this will help us a country and our people in it to adapt
We have always genetically engineered. We simply have called it cross breeding or selective choice. It is a tool that could be used in positive ways to cure disease however it does need to be watched and controlled carefully because one released it can be very difficult to bring under control
Is the process of altering the DNA in an organism_Ñés genome.; This may mean changing one base pair (A-T or C-G), deleting a whole region of DNA, or introducing an additional copy of a gene.
i don_Ñét know enough about it to make a good judgment
Don_Ñét know enough about it to give an opinion
I don_Ñét know loads about it but if it can help in Medical science then why not?
I think it is important, but stronger rules need to be put in place before we create a monster
It is a subject I don't know an awful lot about. If it is being to save people's lives then yes But not to be abused.
genetics have advanced so much already and I personally think it's quite scary so any further advancements would worry me
I am unsure as to what extent we should _ÑÒplay god_Ñ and probably think advancing genetic engineering too far is not a good thing. That being said I do believe when dealing with advance treatment for things like cancer that genetic engineering can play a key role
If genetic engineering assists in eradicating disease then of course it should be advanced
genetic engineering should be advanced for medical reasons only! Not for cosmetic or intelligence reasons
In the treatment of disease only NOT for experiments on embryos for genetic selection
I don't feel we should meddle with genetics let nature take its course
It can be the route to cures for many untreatable illnesses
Progression can not simply be sped up by a simple survey question
It can be used to cure illnesses however should be used in a careful and humane manner
I initially thought about genetic engineering in humans and was unsure, because of the potential implications for disability rights, pressure put on potential parents to undergo genetic testing and make certain decisions on the back of this, pressure to have the 'perfect' baby and potentially disastrous consequences of the loss of some genes from the genepool without understanding the full implications, particularly in terms of epigenetic effects, which is still a very young science. However, I then considered the possible gains, paricularly in agriculture, where producing crops or animals with higher yields could potentially solve problems such as famine in developing nations, pressure on existing food supply chains due to population increases, or further deforestation to make way for farming, and decided that, on balance, these were more pressing issues.
Don't know enough about it to make a plus or minus comment
I would need to know exactly what sort of GE you mean
Tricky one. Most of me thinks it's good idea, to eradicate hereditary conditions, to improve the human race in any way we can, weed out the imperfections. We've always bred animals that way, to improve the species. Farm animals, etc. Why not humans? We have the knowledge, use it. And then there's another part of me that says it's a dangerous game to start tinkering about with, messing about with nature, what happens if we make mistakes, where will it stop, what if it gets out of hand or in the wrong hands? It will happen one day, probably starting with eradicating diseases, hereditary conditions. Inevitable.
Is it should be advanced if it helps with eradication of disease but not for any cosmetic reasons.
It can help some health issues, but should not be used all the time
It could get too out of hand. Taking away jobs
It_Ñés important for medical advances and saving lives
Don_Ñét know if I have enough knowledge of it
Genetic engineering has the greatest chance of curing diseases as it is more specific to a person.
I don't know enough about the subject to say anything.
Genetic engineering in general is unnatural and wrong.
We can learn more and more about genetics if it's advanced
Healthy bodies to fend off against diseases and illnesses, stronger and more adaptable
It will help with people who have faulty genes.
I don't know enough about genetic engineering to know if it is good or bad
The benefits to medical science and prevention of disease are essential
Not sure...there are a lot of positives of scientific breakthroughs and ability to help rare conditions etc but I don't like the idea of selective babies etc..choosint characteristics
Any improvement on something is looking towards the future
Finding a cure for terminal illnesses . Producing new genetics for children with cancer
To cure diseases, to produce pest-resistant plants
I think it could help prevent diseases that are hereditary.
not when you can selection your babys genes
Not enough is known about the full effects of genetic engineering and particularly the unpredictable side effects
Everything needs to be advanced to keep up to date
i think there can be major strides to cure diseases
Genetic engineering indicates scientific research so I am unable to judge how viable and how advanced it is without much knowledge.
i'm somewhat in between agree and neither agree or disagree i think there is some scope for genetic engineering to assist with incurable diseases, however i think there should be some limitations
Because if it was easy everyone would do it
I dont know enough about it to make a decision as to whether i would support it enough so that it may be advanced.
It depends what it is used for, should not be to design babies
Not all science is good science, but I think this could be very good in improving health and good reliable food supplies.
It depends for which purpose it is proposed.
Well it should be advanced as its a high skill
It's good and could give us many useful resources in the future
Should be left the same. Maintain the status quo.
It can help us to prepare for the future
not sure of all the ramifications for good or other in this sector
FOOD PRODUCTION AND HOW TO ADVANCE THIS GENETICALLY
I do not know enough about it to have a strong opinion
I don_Ñét understand genetic engineering to have a full opinion and also depends on what was being modified
I need to be convinced that it will be more healthy, in the food chain, than our present agricultural methods. Until then I cannot support nor eat this type of produce.
I AGREE FOR MEDICAL PURPOSES, BUT WHERE WILL GENETIC ENGINEERING GO?
MOVING TO FAST WITH TEST CAN RESULT IN MORE ERRORS
Genetic engineering is more advanced than evolution, we as a species are not ready for GM produce as our systems haven_Ñét evolved enough to handle the risks and links to cancer are too high to ignore
I think technology should allow us to improve what we can
Don't agree with some of it should tamper with human nature unless you are testing genetics for diseases
I am not sure that changing the genetic makeup of organisms is the right thing to do morally/ethically
I personally dont agree with genetic engineering,but I suppose if it means food for the world,I should go with it
I think it_Ñés an interesting branch of science and deserves to be explored and experimented with to see where it could take us
It "could" provide great advances in Food & Medicine
Not sure its the right thing we should pursue
any thing which is of benefit to mankind should be encouraged
i think it has great possibilities if it is controlled carefully
It can be the key to curing a whole host of diseases and conditions
Interesting field with lots of advancement
I do not feel I know enough about this to say either way.
its going to cause all kinds of problems
would help the society be bigger better and stronger
In this day and age we should be further on with these things. We should be able to cure a lot more than we can now. We can build nuclear bombs after all!
We should make the most of the technology we have these days
we should not interfere with nature in this way,could set dangerous precedents with genetic experiments
It could help medicine and help make science more advanced
I am not entirely sure what Genetic engineering is and why it should be advanced.
you shouldnt mess with things if they aint broke
I don't know enough about the subject to make a judgment
Genetic engineering can cause us to upset the balance of nature that is currently precarious. Humans do not have a good track record in changing the wildlife/fauna by adding or removing animals, I struggle to believe we'd do better manipulating genetics drastically. Plus I do not believe we should be attempting to change humans.
I just don't think genetic engineering should be allowed
We need new ways of solving medical issues
I hav want to go be the back of the video I have attached my r for your reference and hope and help to you too e attached my
Science can do a great deal to improve the people of the earth, and should be allowed to.
There nothing wrong with genetic engineering
It_Ñés not something that I know a lot about
Because if it helps people survive or have a better life then it should be done
I think we keep too many people alive which would otherwise not be here
Could help people but then is unethical at the same time
I don_Ñét know if it_Ñés a good thing or not
Because biology advanced as genetics research are based on it
I don_Ñét no a lot about genetic engineering to say anything about it
I wouldn't feel comfortable for companies to research Genetic Engineering until there was suitable laws in place
It_Ñés not something I believe affects me
it can go too far, i don't believe we should be interfering in this sort of thing as we can't really foresee the consequences
We have to be careful what we allow.just because you can does not mean you should.
the reasons why i dont know much about genetic engineering thats why i choose neither agree or nor disagree
For some genetic inherited conditions like Parkinson_Ñés disease I think it should be developed. For purposes of creating super babies I don_Ñét agree
I think it shouldn't, as it goes against nature.
I don't know enough about this subject to make this decision
It_Ñés moving in and the more it upgrades the better
Genetic engineering has already led to improvements in the food supply to meet the demands of an ever-increasing population. It would therefore seem sensible to continue along this path although it's effects should be carefully monitored.
I feel if it can save lives yes but we can also be doing the opposite
I immediately thought about the positive impacts like the eradication of certain diseases or gene mutations.
it will some day help in fight against disease
i think genetic engineering is going into dangerous territory that could easily be exploited, manipulated and used for negative reasons
I believe its helpful in helping us as a human race in fighting illness and diseases
Genetic engineering has good potential for solving or helping to solve more problems (e.g. health problems)  in the future
Its not something that particularly effects me so I don't mind either way
we are not God, more mutations, unforeseen mutants
I think it can have very positive results for people
It's  been going for a long time now and should be constantly progressing.
I think there are arguments for both sides- arguably the risks are huge
IT WILL BE A GREAT BENEFIT TO MEDICAL SOLUTIONS IN THE FUTURE
I need to know more about it, but it does seem a little unethical, but if the results are extremely positive it may be necessary to progress
Genetic engineering is dangerous in my opinion. It has not been around for long enough to know the outcome of such yet
I'm not informed enough on the subject to have an opinion
I have not got enough informations on this to make further comment.
It has some positives but also some negatives
Genetics is very important subject.everything about the human .so need speciality
Don_Ñét like the idea of genetic engineering creating a perfect sample
We need to invest more money in Engineering in general.
We don;t know the full effects yet or genetic technology so should proceed with caution and a lot more trials before rolling it out
Don't have much knowledge about that but it's very advanced technology
Elimination of debilitating/fatal diseases should be the aim & if genetic engineering can help, advance it.
I'm on the fence with this one, I can see both sides of the argument
It is a complicated scientific area of research where no one really understands the implications yet breeding animals for specific characteristics for instance or plant development for specific features has been going on so s research into genetic engineering into eradicating certain tendencies to develop medical conditions by altering dna in embryos for instance could produce useful and life preserving outcomes.
I don't understand it enough to have an opinion
It needs to be advanced they_Ñére not doing enough
I think it could help society in the future
Better things to spend government money on
I don_Ñét know the risk and benefits enough to comment
Diseases can tackled and wiped out by the use of genetic engineering, the potential to live longer and produce new or better foods. On the other hand, there are a number of disadvantages and can be seen interfering with nature, trying to play God with things that perhaps are better left untouched. We do need at least a few illnesses, there is overpopulation, social problems, defects.
I do not wish to spend my days with robots, although I do believe in its use with regard to true medical enhancement
unsure of this subject so unable to make a clear decision
Its dangerous to mess around with human nature too much.  We are already on a slippery slope as far as this is concerned.
Because if it means being able to genetically alter DNA etc. to get rid of certain diseases then it's a good thing in the long run
GENETIC ENGINEERING SHOULD BE ADVANCED ONLY IF IT DOES NOT AFFECT THE NATURAL BALANCE OF THE POPULATION
It can help children born with terminal diseases
All scientific processes should be advanced but monitored
could be used to advance many different areas but it also raises many moral questions
I_Ñém not sure what generic engineering is
Still early days. Like to hear the bad reports!
not really sure why just if it can do anything it should be tried
To progress we need to  get  the best way forward
It gives us the opportunity to prevent cases of extreme disability in utero and through genetic engineering we may be able to find cures for horrendous diseases.
Too big a question for such a simple answer.
So we can do more to help with illnessess
For the future of animal preservation and medicine
Genetic engineering is very useful, it should not be shunned simply because it opposes the views of many conservative Christians. It is a science that should be developed and used to aid life, and discover new treatments
If it was for good. Eradicating rare conditions
it worries me that thoes from disadvantaged backgrounds will not be able to affor access creating two tiers of peope. I would be happy for gentic engineering to progress providing there is strong regulation.
I don't understand what this is meant to mean
Genetic engineering can be used to solved problems such as malnutrition, but could potentially have unforeseen consequences
There are some instances where such procedures may be beneficial, but there is too much messing about with normal processes
Done in the right way it would be advantageous.
THERE ARE MORE IMPORTANT THINGS TO SPENT MONEY ON
I don't know enough about this. Part of it sounds untested, but it seems enevitable. More research is needed
Once we understand genetics more, we can cure a lot of really nasty diseases and understand other issues.
Don't know enough to make valuable comment
Dislike of altering nature for what might not always be beneficial purposes.
Genetic engineering can be beneficial especially when finding cures to genetic diseases or cures to other conditions that may be affected through DNA or genetic code. However, I think in some cases it should not be advanced such as in cloning. We do not need human or animal clones and I think that this is a waste of time and could even be potentially dangerous.
I don't feel like I'm informed enough on this topic to have an opinion.
the plus side would be a great through medically helping people live longer but it will still be like playing god.
We should use science to the best of our ability
Monsters in the making, too much control of the populace
Many opportunities to solve life threatening conditions
Genetic engineering on????, your question needs to be more specific. Genetic engineering on plants?m food stuff So?, animal Shelter?, aliens from Area 51?, that's such an open question it is frankly crap
Don_Ñét know enough about it to talk about
HUMANS SHOULD ALL BE DIFFERENT, WE'LL END UP ALL BEING ROBOTS
I have no comment for this as I am unsure of what it means fully
I don't feel I have enough knowledge of the subject
i dont know enough on the subject to give  DEFINITIVE answer
I agree with this if it leads to genetic diseases being cured.
I think with advances in technology we should be further on than we currently are
Results could be harmful. Better areas  to invest in
As we age and live longer need medical advance
I think it_Ñés playing a risky game. The more genetically modified a species is, the greater the risk of issues.
Anything we can do to improve the standard of living for the human race genetic engineering included is a good thing
If it's AI built into humans no, if it's cybernetic enhancements or some sort of giving humans their life back, yes
We aren't just evolved enough emotional as humanity to deal with this sort of power
It's important to know about our makeup and influences disease
I've heard about the potential of genetic engineering (human genome project + Stem cell research) on advancing medicine and understanding of diseases and conditions that cause human suffering, so I think it should be explored
It is for the good of the world, and it could provide significant benefits to health and well being.
the evolution of the human species is required to embrace all opportunity, it seems to have slowed down since we started talking to each other
although i believe that genetic engineering will benefit us it is important to ensure that strict controls are in place to prevent unethical practices or research
If it could be used to an ethical advantage for illness prevention etc then I agree but if it_Ñés for just looks then no
I_Ñém not really sure what it is, but it sounds too controlling and trying to play _ÑÉgod_Ñé
I think there are many cures to this research.
Not something I know much about to provide an opinion
I do not know enough to make an informed choice
Humans are not genetic matter to be cherry picked for 'best'
if it is not used to modify a baby before it is born. only if to erase a critical illness or disability. To help crops be drought and disease resistant but not to use unless a last resort for humanity as we don't know about long term damage it will do to environment, animals and us
It could help remove some harmful life changing diseases
It depends on which kind and how it's monitored. There are issues regarding GMO seeds and farmers that need to be considered.
I clicked the wrong button i am not for GM foods I fill we dont know the long term affects
Too many do-gooders are holding back scientific advancement which is there to improve life for mankind
Genetic engineering could be revolutionary in curing diseases
I strongly feel it has all sorts of negative connotations.  How far can science go and if science goes far how is it monitored.
It has useful benefits but needs better regulation
Gene therapy can have a positive role but I don_Ñét trust corporations or regulators to develop broader genetic engineering technologies in a responsible and equitable way.
I'm not convinced it's a positive or necessary thing
It depends on construction in the country
There are big moral dilemmas that don't support genetic engineering
I don't know enough about it to make an informed decision one way or the other
It doesn't matter if a piece of veg or fruit is an odd shape, that's natural.
Important to cure genetic conditions, vital for food security
Scientists should leave well alone, and not tamper with the order of nature
Genetic engineering has a great potential for good; the removal of hereditary diseases and defects; the reduction of risks for certain diseases and the increased potential for longer healthier lives for everyone.
I don`t know enough about this topic to have an opinion
Nature is a wonder, however it needs a hand sometimes. Genetic engineering can help.
Some good things from this but it is a bit of a worry how far this may go.
I don_Ñét care towards genetic engineering
Genetic engineering has benefits and weaknesses, but I feel as though I don't know enough about it to make a decision.
(Genetic) engineering?! it is unnatural, Extremely arrogant, and definitely wrong no matter the cost.
See benefits for disease but needs regulation
well that depends whose hands the research will fall into after it get the green light. It could be a good thing, depending on its use, or a bad thing depending on its misuse.
i don_Ñét believe in genetic engineering
It's important to increase our research into such things and not doing so based on religion or in some cases ethics is irresponsible as a species.
I think it is already advanced and should b more
It opens up doorways to new paths, paths that our past generation were too scared to dive in to.
I feel that there are more important things at the moment
I believe it is for the benefit and advancement of human beings and medical innovation
I think everything is advancing now so this should be to
I don_Ñét really know very much about it to comment
I just think its wrong to man make something that should be natural.
The eradication of disease and being able to grow organs from stem cells etc., seems great, however it could run into a bit of a eugenics problem, with people modifying embryos for aesthetic reasons and eventually eradicating certain genes or characteristics
Very broad statement. Good and bad aspects. On balance significant benefits outweigh negatives.
I'm not sure I understand what is meant by this
I don't understand enough about it to make a comment
I don't know enough about it to have an opinion on it
it should be regulated, and only used for medical advances, not cosmetic reasons
depends what is meant by advancing genetic engineering, if for carefully thought through medical interventions I'm for it. If in a free for all then no.
we should use technology to improve our society
Useful for curing amd preventing disease.
If we can eradicate gene based illness it_Ñés an amazing thing
do not know what genetic engineering is to do with so that is why i put neither agree or disagree
not sure if i have an opinion on this, i just dont know enough on this subject
Because I don't have a strong opion either way!
Difficult question as genetic engineering could help lots of people but not sure I really agree with it .
I'm not sure the benefits of advanced physics or science in this respect are that great, or that relevant or useful to the human being.  I think genetic advances have some use but their application is complex.
If by doing so it helps unborn babies then can only be a good thing.
It is not something I ever want to consume as I am worried about the negative effects GM foods could have on my health and on the environment. GM foods haven't been around long enough for people to fully know all the unintended negative consequences they may have.
I don't know enough about it to have a strong view please let me have all the facts and I'll give it some thought not a subject for Yes/No answers
Genetic engineering has the potential to be groundbreaking in what it can achieve for the world. I fully support ways to lower production cost, time while raisin supply to meet certain demands
It will help many people with a number of medical conditions.
It should be advanced but carefully regulalated. so that it is advanced for the right reasons.
I think it is important for technologies to be developed as mush as possible. the same goes for engineering
will help sociaty and advance the human race
genetic engineering is one of those pseudo sciences that do not contribute to the general prosperity of the human race
More treatments for genetic conditions and cancer
It depends on the purpose of the genetic engineering
Because I think we have so many more illnesses that we can help people recover and lead normal lives than many years ago and further enhancements to this can only help
Important aspect in life, important role to fill
We need to find ways to make human survival more stable
It_Ñés too vague a statement to agree or disagree with
The use of genetic engineering to prevent/identify illnesses is important
you play too much with genetics and you will cause unforseen problems
I don't think we should mess with nature and although I can see there are some benefits to be had, it scares me
Depends on what it is used for.   Good for helping diseases but not altering embryos etc.
I don_Ñét know enough about the subject to have a view.
we have to feed the world's poor and those in areas where crops and livestock cannot survive without some intervention, also we have 1st world persons who seem unwilling to survive on what their own environments can provide and are putting massive strain on the world's poorer nations to provide 'vegan' and other foods to support a selfish 'lifestyle'
I don't enough about the topic to comment on it
I'm uncomfortable with this type of manipulation
The thought makes me uncomfortable. I think in the UK, and generally in the West, we have yet to have a full and open debate about this issue.
Stop fiddling with God_Ñés world and nature as it is doing so much harm
It will cause human problems and it too scary a thought.
To benefit those who have serious health problems
Not sure it's very ethical and could be used in the wrong way
I do not believe in interfering with natural things.
I know that there is a lot of good that can come from genetic engineering but there could also be some risk that it gets abused
I think that it_Ñés good because  it allows people to have  children but it can cause super babies
In the aspect of health if progress saves lives and cures illnesses
I believe it will increase food availability and reduce starvation and the cost of food
The money used for the unknown should be put into the nhs
Let nature take care of it, and researchers
It can save millions of lives. Poor people need the technology but rich people are stopping them from accessing it.
worry about the control of this. good idea so long as monitored
For food production, health, materials science - and who knows what is around the corner
not sure whether it would all be useful to mankind
Knowledge of it should be expanded even if it is not used
It is ok in theory, my concern is how far people are prepared to go with it and will it because by people looking for 'perfection'
I don_Ñét know if it_Ñés the right thing to do
I don't know much about genetic engineering but I think it will help the world in the future
Unsure of the future messing about with genetics could be making things worse rather than progress.
Just one of those things i can't make my mind up about
Depends on why and on what ie food animals or humans
I don't think we should play with nature to that degree
Don't know enough about the subject to have an informed opinion.
The future has many opportunities to make life better for all
It should be advanced to weed out genetic deficiencies/mutations
Need to know more about the subject, still early days in this field
I think interfering with nature in this way could lead to drastic consequences
Properly regulated medical advances are possible
Not too familiar with the meaning to choose either way
I don't know what we can gain from genetic modification
genetic engineering isn't of interest to me
this will enable us to improve technology for the future
I don't know enough about genetic engineering to comment.
It doesn't play a massive role in my life
If it can help with illness then that's great!
I am mistrustful of genetically modified food. Genetic engineering to eradicate disease would be a good thing.
It depends on what the goal is. If it combats disease, then yes.
I don't really understand what genetic engineering is
Could eradicate disease, increase food production
Genetic engineering has the potential to eliminate hereditary disease in humans and make crops more resistant to insects or harsh climates.
firstly it depends on your definition of genetic engineering, but if it means things such as stem cell research and gene therapy then I think those are significant and important to advancing medicine
We should be more informed about how genetic works
We are a human race not self styled robots
Genetic engineering should be advanced until controlled circumstances and with a continued moral debate around the applications it is used for
It is a technology with huge potential - everything from curing cancer to improving agriculture.
I think it's asking for trouble. Firstly it will start with preface for eye or hair colour then skin, then abilities then tinkering in brain and I can see it going down X-Men type route.
Scientific advances can only be good for us
i chose a neutral answer because i don't know much about genetic engineering to comment
I don't know too much about genetic engineering
It can overstep its mark by messing with people's dignity. However for other things it could advance like technology
I do not know the meaning of genetic engineering
We should be able to turn things that are useless and worthless into something that is life saving
GENETIC ENGINEERING ALLOWS FOR GENETIC MATERIAL TO BE CHANGED IN SUCH A WAY  IT ALLOWS FOR THE PRODUCTION OF NEW SUBSTANCES OR NEW FUNCTIONS.
I think that science should be able to progress unhindered by most ethics or morals in order to provide humanity with better standards of living
for me science is progress; and progress in science is beneficial to the economy
Opportunities to develop medical capabilities and food for all to remove famine.
I don_Ñét know enough about it too comment
I was thinking of human diseases and finding cures in particular cancer. More needs to be done
due not agree with genetic engineering at all
The organisms can be used to produce molecules of benefit to humans. One of the first cases of human benefit from genetic engineering was the production of human insulin in bacterial cells. Since the successful production of genetically engineered insulin, many other human proteins have been produced in this manner.
To help develop health care processes and procedures
too simplistic a statement to agree or disagree with, a lot depends on context and details
Dont think genetics should be meddled with except for illnesses
I think it_Ñés altering and cloning genes
This could help cure currently terminal illnesses and save lives.
Because I thick theres more important things
IN SOME AREAS, EG ANIMAL BREEDING, THIS COULD LEAD TO MORE FOOD. BUT IT IS NOT FOR THE HUMAN POPULATION
Leads to Gregory is dead and wrong hands
Whilst I do not agree with the slaughter of disabled people, such as the Nazis practiced, I am in favour of modern medicine being used to help with the eradication of defects of foetuses while in the womb. If haemophilia, spina bifida and other genetically inherited diseases can be prevented, sometimes, admittedly by abortion of a foetus, so that more healthy children are born than those with disabilities, then surely that is an advancement. Muslims intermarry within family groups and the results of these partnerings are quite often appalling, some children being born with anencephaly or other physical disabilities. I've seen these poor, trembling creatures being brought to Addenbrooke's Hospital in Cambridge. They have no life, they can't see, they're deaf and blind. They cost both their families and the NHS dear. If we have the ability to stop people having children like this then I believe we should, for the good of everyone. It's not as if humans are threatened with extinction!
It is to search the posibilities of human reproduction etc
It was a mistake like I said in did not read the question very well please bear with me
I don't understand what Genetic engineering is.
Genetic engineering, although it may help in limiting illnesses in later life, would open a floodgate when it comes to tampering with human DNA. It would also mean only certain social groups would be able to afford the benefits of genetic engineering and therefore would leave the wealthy at a genetic advantage.
Don_Ñét know enough about this topic to comment
Need more facts before agreeing or diagreeing
Genetic engineering would be classed by some people as "Playing God". Genetic engineering can be good in some respects in combatting genetic ailments.
The science of genetic engineering can be used to treat complex medical conditions
I worry we are going to destroy the human race with too much science and tinkering with biology and cause more problems than we solve
Agree that it should be advanced but not at a rapid uncontrollable pace
If Hitler thought it was a good idea then I automatically know it`s wrong.
Don't know enough about it to have a strong opinion.
i feel that this is unnatural, making things which are engineered. dont like it.
Should not be allowed to play God with humans
Genetic engineering is an interesting area, I think if we can make it so people will be less likely to do things such as be aggressive if we can alter genetics it would be useful in the long run
I don't believe that Humans should be cloned
We are going so far with technology that we need to be up to date with everything
I don't feel I have any knowle5om this subject to give my opionon
because it could be benificial to help people
Genetic engineering could help us in future to find cure for bad diseases like cancer etc. We should work towards it but it should be in a controlled environment.
we need to move up in the world and this would help
I don_Ñét know what genetic engineering is.
Genetic engineering is a thing of the future
It can help families who are unable to have children
I think it would be good to be able to create anything with ease.
With the growing world population and climate change we need to develop crops that will prevent there being food shortages.
I think mankind has gone too far with trying to play at being God.  Messing with nature and God's creation can only be a dangerous game to play.
i think it depends on the direction it takes and not the principle
Genetic engineering has the capacity of healing vast numbers of people suffering with pre destined illnesses. I do agree that it should be closely monitored and not used for war or harm
This day and age it should be more advanced than it is to assist with our way of life
Not sure of the impact.  Could be used for good with severe disabilities/illnesses but would need to be managed carefully as not for designer medicine
A bit of a scary thought. Not sure about this
We need to move in advancement of treatment of various illnesses and genetics are essential.  Food supplies are not finite
Humans should not play god and mess about with nature
to eliminate genetic disabilities and illnesses
I am not full appraised of all the facts. However, I think more work needs to be donethe forward evolution of the human race if we go down this path
I do not understand meaning of statement does it mean should be promoted? Or does it mean if it exists it should be at an advanced level?
I don't think we should fiddle about with such things.
I'm assuming a lot of money gets pumped into this and it is worked on by some very clever people too so with that being said I expect it to be advanced
I don_Ñét really know too much about it so I can_Ñét say either way
it should be used for the betterment for people and our society
I_Ñém not really sure what the statement means
We could help cure more illnesses and diseases
I don't know enough about the subject to hold any strong opinions either way.
We should always look forward and advance technology.
It_Ñés dangerous and shouldn_Ñét be messed with
If undertaken safely and carefully it promises to be enormously helpful and cost-effective in health care
There are significant benefits as low v as it is may marshalled appropriately
It is not natural, and potentially unethical
the human body is a marvel of evolution, but its very complexity has resulted in numerous genetic defects. If we can 'engineer out' these problems to better of mankind and to eliminate/reduce suffering then we should do so.
I think it could have its advantages when it comes to helping everyone but I think it is also open for misuse
Genetic engineering is dangerous and could lead to unforeseen but serious consequence for all species
There are too many ethical issues with it and if the technology was introduced at higher rates, it would create a health gap dependent on wealth
As a Christian I believe Gods work should not be interfered with and their could be consequences down the line in terms of compatibility with human organs.
WHAT IS THE POINT JUST SO PEOPLE CAN HAVE DESIGNER BABIES
Genetic engineering brings alot of hope to cure many diseases and disorders
Advances in bio-medical genetics on a cellular level and also to help the environment and future food shortages worldwide.
Genetic Engineering can be used to produce bacteria that produce insulin which is valuable to people with diabetes
This could be very dangerous for example designer babies. Also if you modify for example a fruit we don't know what the effects will be in the future, for example the butterfly's insects and animals that eat that fruit. Human beings cannot be trusted to play god look at our track record
Could produce huge advancements for medicine and surgery
It_Ñés the future and hope for this world
Genetic engineering could help improve food quality and make foods hardier so they can be grown in other areas- this would mean countries could become more self sufficient and there would be reduction in oil use and greenhouse gases through less need to transport food long distances. Genetic engineering of people could help wipe out some conditions and diseases, but there needs to be improvements to ensure flaws do not prevail.
Not all areas need advancing as some steps are too far
Genetics should be left as you got given
still not sure how this would if it was in the food chain
It could make a difference in treating people with illnesses
Help support research into curing diseases and helping live a longer life
Not sure how genetic engineering would be regulated and whether it would be used for good or bad
I don_Ñét really know enough about this to form a proper opinion - and I also think it depends on what context this is used
Unless there is a strong medical reason things should be left alone
It can be used for the wrong reasons by people in power
It will help the environment, help solve health problems
It will happen anyway, so it should be regulated to ensure that all experiments are ethical
I don't feel that genetic engineering is appropriate unless its to aid medical research
Yeah I_Ñém going home to do a good day at home I_Ñéll probably do w I know miss you too
there are medical positives, but misuse is a worry
Depends, modifying things that should be natural is a bit iffy but curing things by modifying etc is good
messing with nature could have massively bad consequences
depends the reason behind it, if it saves lives then yes, if it is for self gain or to fit in then no
Could be a potential cure/prevention from illness and dusease. Also, good for transplants if donors cannot be found.
Peoples genes should be paid more attention too
Could be useful for helping against different illnesses
Trying to iradicate disease by genetic engineering is a good thing but it leaves man playing god and I cannot wholeheartedly agree with this.
Don_Ñét really know much about this subject to comment on
I don't know enough about it to comment either way.
There are a lot of benefits to genetic engineering, specifically when it comes to the eradication of certain diseases and genetic conditions. However, irrational fears hold back a lot of research. With the right safeguards in place we should be able to move forwards further than we have, not cower back when we have the knowledge to go further.
How far do you go with this very important idea