Person:

Braslow, David

Research has shown that test-based accountability programs often produce score inflation. Most studies have evaluated inflation by comparing trends on a high-stakes test and a lower-stakes audit test. However, Koretz and Benguin (2010) noted the weaknesses of using external audit tests and suggested instead using self-monitoring assessments (SMAs), which incorporate into high-stakes tests audit items that are not susceptible to test preparation aimed at more predictable items. This paper reports the results of the first three trials of the SMA approach, evaluating whether SMAs can detect inflation in a context in which it has been demonstrated to exist. The studies were conducted with the New York State mathematics tests in grades 4, 7, and 8 in 2011 and 2012. Despite a severe conservative bias created by numerous aspects of the study designs, we found that the audit component functioned as expected in many of the trials. The difference in performance between nonaudit and audit items was associated with factors that earlier research showed to be related to test preparation and score inflation, such as "bubble-student" status (scoring just below the Proficient cut in the previous year) and school poverty. However, a number of trials yielded null findings. These findings underscore the need for additional research investigating the optimal characteristics of audit items.