Person:

Belinkov, Yonatan

Loading...
Profile Picture

Email Address

AA Acceptance Date

Birth Date

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Job Title

Last Name

Belinkov

First Name

Yonatan

Name

Belinkov, Yonatan

Search Results

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
  • Publication

    On Adversarial Removal of Hypothesis-only Bias in Natural Language Inference

    (2019-06) Belinkov, Yonatan; Poliak, Adam; Shieber, Stuart; Van Durme, Benjamin; Rush, Alexander Sasha

    Popular Natural Language Inference (NLI) datasets have been shown to be tainted by hypothesis-only biases. Adversarial learning may help models ignore sensitive biases and spurious correlations in data. We evaluate whether adversarial learning can be used in NLI to encourage models to learn representa- tions free of hypothesis-only biases. Our analyses indicate that the representations learned via adversarial learning may be less biased, with only small drops in NLI accuracy.

  • Publication

    Don't Take the Premise for Granted: Mitigating Artifacts in Natural Language Inference

    (Association of Computational Linguistics, 2019-07) Belinkov, Yonatan; Poliak, Adam; Shieber, Stuart; Van Durme, Benjamin; Rush, Alexander Sasha

    Natural Language Inference (NLI) datasets often contain hypothesis-only biases—artifacts that allow models to achieve non-trivial performance without learning whether a premise entails a hypothesis. We propose two probabilistic methods to build models that are more robust to such biases and better transfer across datasets. In contrast to standard approaches to NLI, our methods predict the probability of a premise given a hypothesis and NLI label, discouraging models from ignoring the premise. We evaluate our methods on synthetic and existing NLI datasets by training on datasets containing biases and testing on datasets containing no (or different) hypothesis-only biases. Our results indicate that these methods can make NLI models more robust to dataset-specific artifacts, transferring better than a baseline architecture in 9 out of 12 NLI datasets. Additionally, we provide an extensive analysis of the interplay of our methods with known biases in NLI datasets, as well as the effects of encouraging models to ignore biases and fine-tuning on target datasets.