Publication:

Computational Thinking and Assignment Resubmission Predict Persistence in a Computer Science MOOC

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

2020-02-27

Published Version

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Wiley
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Citation

Chen, Chen, Gerhard Sonnert, Philip M. Sadler, and David J. Malan. 2020. Computational Thinking and Assignment Resubmission Predict Persistence in a Computer Science MOOC. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning: 1–14.

Abstract

Massive open online course (MOOC) studies have shown that precourse skills (such as precomputational thinking) and course engagement measures (such as making multiple submission attempts with assignments when the initial submission is incorrect) predict students' grade performance, yet little is known about whether these factors predict students' course retention. In applying survival analysis to a sample of more than 20,000 participants from one popular computer science MOOC, we found that students' precomputational thinking skills and their perseverance in assignment submission strongly predict their persistence in the MOOC. Moreover, we discovered that precomputational thinking skills, programming experience, and gender, which were previously considered to be constant predictors of students' retention, have effects that attenuate over the course milestones. This finding suggests that MOOC educators should take a growth perspective towards students' persistence: As students overcome the initial hurdles, their resilience grows stronger.

Description

Other Available Sources

Research Data

Keywords

Education, Computer Science Applications

Terms of Use

Metadata Only

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Related Stories