Publication:
National evaluation of the benefits and risks of greater structuring and coding of the electronic health record: exploratory qualitative investigation

Thumbnail Image

Date

2014

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

BMJ Publishing Group
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Citation

Morrison, Zoe, Bernard Fernando, Dipak Kalra, Kathrin Cresswell, and Aziz Sheikh. 2014. “National evaluation of the benefits and risks of greater structuring and coding of the electronic health record: exploratory qualitative investigation.” Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA 21 (3): 492-500. doi:10.1136/amiajnl-2013-001666. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/amiajnl-2013-001666.

Research Data

Abstract

Objective: We aimed to explore stakeholder views, attitudes, needs, and expectations regarding likely benefits and risks resulting from increased structuring and coding of clinical information within electronic health records (EHRs). Materials and methods Qualitative investigation in primary and secondary care and research settings throughout the UK. Data were derived from interviews, expert discussion groups, observations, and relevant documents. Participants (n=70) included patients, healthcare professionals, health service commissioners, policy makers, managers, administrators, systems developers, researchers, and academics. Results: Four main themes arose from our data: variations in documentation practice; patient care benefits; secondary uses of information; and informing and involving patients. We observed a lack of guidelines, co-ordination, and dissemination of best practice relating to the design and use of information structures. While we identified immediate benefits for direct care and secondary analysis, many healthcare professionals did not see the relevance of structured and/or coded data to clinical practice. The potential for structured information to increase patient understanding of their diagnosis and treatment contrasted with concerns regarding the appropriateness of coded information for patients. Conclusions: The design and development of EHRs requires the capture of narrative information to reflect patient/clinician communication and computable data for administration and research purposes. Increased structuring and/or coding of EHRs therefore offers both benefits and risks. Documentation standards within clinical guidelines are likely to encourage comprehensive, accurate processing of data. As data structures may impact upon clinician/patient interactions, new models of documentation may be necessary if EHRs are to be read and authored by patients.

Description

Keywords

Electronic Health Records, Electronic Patient Records, Data Structure, Clinical Coding, Patient Communication

Terms of Use

This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material (LAA), as set forth at Terms of Service

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By

Related Stories