Publication: Sexually-dimorphic targeting of functionally-related genes in COPD
Open/View Files
Date
2014
Published Version
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
BioMed Central
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.
Citation
Glass, Kimberly, John Quackenbush, Edwin K Silverman, Bartolome Celli, Stephen I Rennard, Guo-Cheng Yuan, and Dawn L DeMeo. 2014. “Sexually-dimorphic targeting of functionally-related genes in COPD.” BMC Systems Biology 8 (1): 118. doi:10.1186/s12918-014-0118-y. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12918-014-0118-y.
Research Data
Abstract
Background: There is growing evidence that many diseases develop, progress, and respond to therapy differently in men and women. This variability may manifest as a result of sex-specific structures in gene regulatory networks that influence how those networks operate. However, there are few methods to identify and characterize differences in network structure, slowing progress in understanding mechanisms driving sexual dimorphism. Results: Here we apply an integrative network inference method, PANDA (Passing Attributes between Networks for Data Assimilation), to model sex-specific networks in blood and sputum samples from subjects with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). We used a jack-knifing approach to build an ensemble of likely networks for each sex. By adapting statistical methods to compare these network ensembles, we were able to identify strong differential-targeting patterns associated with functionally-related sets of genes, including those involved in mitochondrial function and energy metabolism. Network analysis also identified several potential sex- and disease-specific transcriptional regulators of these pathways. Conclusions: Network analysis yielded insight into potential mechanisms driving sexual dimorphism in COPD that were not evident from gene expression analysis alone. We believe our ensemble approach to network analysis provides a principled way to capture sex-specific regulatory relationships and could be applied to identify differences in gene regulatory patterns in a wide variety of diseases and contexts. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12918-014-0118-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Description
Other Available Sources
Keywords
Network modeling, Gene regulation, Regulatory networks, Sexual-dimorphism, Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease
Terms of Use
This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material (LAA), as set forth at Terms of Service