Publication:

Role of Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole Prophylaxis Against the Infectious Complications of Rituximab Treatment in Autoimmune Blistering Diseases – a Retrospective Descriptive Study

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

2015-06-15

Published Version

Published Version

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Citation

Williams, Ramone. 2015. Role of Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole Prophylaxis Against the Infectious Complications of Rituximab Treatment in Autoimmune Blistering Diseases – a Retrospective Descriptive Study. Doctoral dissertation, Harvard Medical School.

Abstract

Background: Rituximab has emerged as a highly successful treatment in patients with severe-refractory autoimmune blistering diseases (AIBD) including pemphigus vulgaris. Marked clinical responses have been documented within just a few weeks of therapy and response rates as high as 97% have been reported. The B cell depleting action of rituximab occurs within 2 weeks of the first infusion and persists for an average of 11 months. Patients with AIBD on rituximab, often receive concurrent therapy with steroids and immunosuppressive agents. Thus, the B cell depleting action of rituximab occurs in the setting of glucocorticoid-mediated T cell suppression. Severe infection after rituximab treatment has been reported in up to 10% of patients, some fatal. This study investigates the rate and spectrum of infectious complications of rituximab in AIBD and potential role of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) prophylaxis. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of 30 patients with AIBD treated with rituximab. Patients received varying protocols of rituximab treatment. All patients received concurrent systemic corticosteroids and/ or immunosuppressive agents. We analyzed the incidence and spectrum of infectious complications as well as the use of antibiotic prophylaxis in the cohort. Results: Seventy-seven percent of patients received antibiotic prophylaxis. Thirty-three percent of patients developed at least one infectious complication of rituximab, 7% of infections were fatal. TMP-SMX was the agent of choice. The mean duration of antibiotic prophylaxis was 9 months. No adverse effects of TMP-SMX were observed. There was a decreased rate of infectious complications in patients who received antibiotic prophylaxis (RR 0.4; p 0.05), however this trend was not statistically significant. Conclusion: Even in the absence of published guidelines, physicians frequently administer TMP-SMX as prophylaxis for infections in patients with AIBD on rituximab, during treatment and in subsequent periods of B cell depletion. Based on our findings and existing guidelines for patients long term prednisone, we advocate for the use of TMP-SMX prophylaxis in patients with AIBD on rituximab and concurrent steroid-immunosuppressive therapy.

Description

Other Available Sources

Research Data

Keywords

Terms of Use

This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material (LAA), as set forth at Terms of Service

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Related Stories