Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorde Asla, Richard J
dc.contributor.authorKozánek, Michal
dc.contributor.authorWan, Lu
dc.contributor.authorRubash, Harry E.
dc.contributor.authorLi, Guoan
dc.date.accessioned2013-01-08T17:00:58Z
dc.date.issued2009
dc.identifier.citationde Asla, Richard J., Michal Kozánek, Lu Wan, Harry E. Rubash, and Guoan Li. 2009. Function of anterior talofibular and calcaneofibular ligaments during in-vivo motion of the ankle joint complex. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research 4:7.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1749-799Xen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:10140313
dc.description.abstractBackground: Despite the numerous in-vitro studies on the mechanical properties and simulated injury mechanisms of the anterior talofibular ligament (ATFL) and calcaneofibular ligament (CFL), the in-vivo biomechanical behavior of these two ligaments has not yet been described. Methods: Apparent length of the ATFL and CFL was measured in four ankles in healthy male subjects between 32 and 45 years of age (two left and two right) during a dorsiflexion-plantarflexion and supination-pronation arc of motion using a combined dual-orthogonal fluoroscopic and magnetic resonance imaging technique. Results: The ATFL elongated from the neutral position at 16.3 +/- 3.0 mm to 20.8 +/- 2.7 mm at maximal plantarflexion and shortened significantly from the neutral position to 13.9 +/- 2.9 mm at maximal dorsiflexion (p = 0.01). The CFL shortened from the neutral position at 28.0 +/- 2.9 mm to 26.6 +/- 2.2 mm at maximal plantarflexion (p = 0.08) and elongated significantly from the neutral position to 29.9 +/- 3.0 mm at maximal dorsiflexion (p = 0.003). The ATFL elongated significantly from 14.8 +/- 2.5 mm at maximal pronation to 17.4 +/- 3.0 mm at maximal supination (p = 0.08). At the same time, the CFL shortened from 31.0 +/- 3.8 mm at maximal pronation to 26.9 +/- 3.6 mm at maximal supination (p = 0.02). Conclusion: The results showed that the ATFL elongates more during plantarflexion and supination whereas the CFL increases in length with dorsiflexion and pronation. Concurrently, these data also demonstrated the reciprocal function between the two ligaments. While one shortens, the other one elongates. The different elongation of the ATFL and CFL during the same motion arc suggests that under excessive loading conditions the ATFL might be more vulnerable in plantarflexion and supination while the CFL might be more susceptible to injury in dorsiflexion and pronation. Furthermore, in the case of surgical reconstruction the grafts used to reconstruct the two ligaments may need to be tensioned at different positions of the ankle in order to reproduce their natural in vivo function.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherBioMed Centralen_US
dc.relation.isversionofdoi://10.1186/1749-799X-4-7en_US
dc.relation.hasversionhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2666648/pdf/en_US
dc.relation.hasversionhttp://www.josr-online.com/content/4/1/7en_US
dash.licenseLAA
dc.titleFunction of Anterior Talofibular and Calcaneofibular Ligaments During In-Vivo Motion of the Ankle Joint Complexen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.description.versionVersion of Recorden_US
dc.relation.journalJournal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Researchen_US
dash.depositing.authorRubash, Harry E.
dc.date.available2013-01-08T17:00:58Z
dash.affiliation.otherHMS^Orthopedic Surgery-Mass General Hospitalen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/1749-799X-4-7*
dash.contributor.affiliatedRubash, Harry
dash.contributor.affiliatedLi, Guoan


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record