Recruitment to Multicentre Trials—Lessons from UKCTOCS: Descriptive Study

DSpace/Manakin Repository

Recruitment to Multicentre Trials—Lessons from UKCTOCS: Descriptive Study

Citable link to this page


Title: Recruitment to Multicentre Trials—Lessons from UKCTOCS: Descriptive Study
Author: Menon, Usha; Gentry-Maharaj, Aleksandra; Ryan, Andy; Sharma, Aarti; Burnell, Matthew; Hallett, Rachel; Lopez, Alberto; Godfrey, Keith; Oram, David; Herod, Jonathan; Williamson, Karin; Seif, Mourad; Scott, Ian; Mould, Tim; Woolas, Robert; Murdoch, John; Dobbs, Stephen; Amso, Nazar; Leeson, Simon; Cruickshank, Derek; McGuire, Ali; Campbell, Stuart; Fallowfield, Lesley; Parmar, Mahesh; Jacobs, Ian; Lewis, Sarah Catherine; Skates, Steven J.

Note: Order does not necessarily reflect citation order of authors.

Citation: Menon, Usha, Aleksandra Gentry-Maharaj, Andy Ryan, Aarti Sharma, Matthew Burnell, Rachel Hallett, Sara Lewis, et al. 2008. Recruitment to multicentre trials—lessons from UKCTOCS: Descriptive study. British Medical Journal 337:a2079.
Full Text & Related Files:
Abstract: Objective: To describe the factors that contributed to successful recruitment of more than 200,000 women to the UK Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening, one of the largest ever randomised controlled trials. Design Descriptive study. Setting 13 NHS trusts in England, Wales, and Northern Ireland. Participants Postmenopausal women aged 50-74; exclusion criteria included ovarian malignancy, bilateral oophorectomy, increased risk of familial ovarian cancer, active non-ovarian malignancy, and participation in other ovarian cancer screening trials. Main outcome measures: Achievement of target recruitment, acceptance rates of invitation, and recruitment rates. Results: The trial was set up in 13 centres with 27 adjoining local health authorities. The coordinating centre team was led by one of the senior investigators, who was closely involved in planning and day to day trial management. Of 1,243,282 women invited, 23.2% (288,955) replied that they were eligible and would like to participate. Of those sent appointments, 73.6% (205,090) attended for recruitment. The acceptance rate varied from 19% to 33% between trial centres. Measures to ensure target recruitment included named coordinating centre staff supporting and monitoring each centre, prompt identification and resolution of logistic problems, varying the volume of invitations by centre, using local non-attendance rates to determine the size of recruitment clinics, and organising large ad hoc clinics supported by coordinating centre staff. The trial randomised 202,638 women in 4.3 years. Conclusions: Planning and trial management are as important as trial design and require equal attention from senior investigators. Successful recruitment needs constant monitoring by a committed proactive management team that is willing to explore individual solutions for different centres and use central resources to improve local recruitment. Automation of trial processes with web based trial management systems is crucial in large multicentre randomised controlled trials. Recruitment can be further enhanced by using information videos and group discussions.
Published Version: doi:10.1136/bmj.a2079
Other Sources:
Terms of Use: This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at
Citable link to this page:
Downloads of this work:

Show full Dublin Core record

This item appears in the following Collection(s)


Search DASH

Advanced Search