Association of Communication Between Hospital-Based Physicians and Primary Care Providers with Patient Outcomes

DSpace/Manakin Repository

Association of Communication Between Hospital-Based Physicians and Primary Care Providers with Patient Outcomes

Citable link to this page

 

 
Title: Association of Communication Between Hospital-Based Physicians and Primary Care Providers with Patient Outcomes
Author: Bell, Chaim M.; Kaboli, Peter J.; Wetterneck, Tosha B.; Gonzales, David V.; Arora, Vineet M.; Zhang, James X.; Meltzer, David O.; Schnipper, Jeffrey Lawrence; Auerbach, Andrew D.

Note: Order does not necessarily reflect citation order of authors.

Citation: Bell, Chaim M., Jeffrey L. Schnipper, Andrew D. Auerbach, Peter J. Kaboli, Tosha B. Wetterneck, David V. Gonzales, Vineet M. Arora, James X. Zhang, and David O. Meltzer. 2008. Association of communication between hospital-based physicians and primary care providers with patient outcomes. Journal of General Internal Medicine 24(3): 381-386.
Full Text & Related Files:
Abstract: Background: Patients admitted to general medicine inpatient services are increasingly cared for by hospital-based physicians rather than their primary care providers (PCPs). This separation of hospital and ambulatory care may result in important care discontinuities after discharge. We sought to determine whether communication between hospital-based physicians and PCPs influences patient outcomes. Methods: We approached consecutive patients admitted to general medicine services at six US academic centers from July 2001 to June 2003. A random sample of the PCPs for consented patients was contacted 2 weeks after patient discharge and surveyed about communication with the hospital medical team. Responses were linked with the 30-day composite patient outcomes of mortality, hospital readmission, and emergency department (ED) visits obtained through follow-up telephone survey and National Death Index search. We used hierarchical multi-variable logistic regression to model whether communication with the patient’s PCP was associated with the 30-day composite outcome. Results: A total of 1,772 PCPs for 2,336 patients were surveyed with 908 PCPs responses and complete patient follow-up available for 1,078 patients. The PCPs for 834 patients (77%) were aware that their patient had been admitted to the hospital. Of these, direct communication between PCPs and inpatient physicians took place for 194 patients (23%), and a discharge summary was available within 2 weeks of discharge for 347 patients (42%). Within 30 days of discharge, 233 (22%) patients died, were readmitted to the hospital, or visited an ED. In adjusted analyses, no relationship was seen between the composite outcome and direct physician communication (adjusted odds ratio 0.87, 95% confidence interval 0.56 – 1.34), the presence of a discharge summary (0.84, 95% CI 0.57–1.22), or PCP awareness of the index hospitalization (1.08, 95% CI 0.73–1.59). Conclusion: Analysis of communication between PCPs and inpatient medical teams revealed much room for improvement. Although communication during handoffs of care is important, we were not able to find a relationship between several aspects of communication and associated adverse clinical outcomes in this multi-center patient sample.
Published Version: doi:10.1007/s11606-008-0882-8
Other Sources: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2642573/pdf/
Terms of Use: This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of-use#LAA
Citable link to this page: http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:10236031
Downloads of this work:

Show full Dublin Core record

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

 
 

Search DASH


Advanced Search
 
 

Submitters